Ha - I see it's Ratatui based. Nice work there :D
Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
51–60 of 98 posts
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#52Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#53The blue CRT glow of Turbo C++ / QBasic 4.5 IDE at 12 AM when I've snuck up in the middle of the night to poke around on the family computer on a school night when I was ~10 years old... I love this.
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for the feedback, maybe I'll redo the screenshots
I recommend VHS generally for these (we use them for all the ratatui screenshots generally). I'm also playing around with doing a rust version of this ( https://www.joshka.net/betamax/ )
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#55Looking at this makes me nostalgic in a way the author probably hasn't intended. Rust is notorious for its slow compile times, while Turbo Pascal was known to be blazingly fast. And the debugger, one of the most important part of the experience is "Not implemented". Dressing it as a 1989 IDE makes me painfully aware of what we have lost. Despite running on hardware that were orders of magnitudes slower than today, so…
>> Rust is notorious for its slow compile times Don't forget Haskell. And what's other... C++, OCaml, etc? I guess a language with complex/complicated design is difficult to be compiled "blazing fast"
Zig and Go would probably be better modern languages for this. Also "Turbo Zig" and "Turbo Go" sound cool, "Trust" sounds too corporate :)
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#56Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Random aside: Back in the day Microsoft used the "Quick" prefix and Borland used "Turbo" . I am waiting for a QRUST.
VisualRust
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#58Everything felt exciting and so close to really understanding what’s going on. And just seeing the blue text interface reminded me of how much fun that was…
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#59Looking at this makes me nostalgic in a way the author probably hasn't intended. Rust is notorious for its slow compile times, while Turbo Pascal was known to be blazingly fast. And the debugger, one of the most important part of the experience is "Not implemented". Dressing it as a 1989 IDE makes me painfully aware of what we have lost. Despite running on hardware that were orders of magnitudes slower than today, so…
>> Rust is notorious for its slow compile times Don't forget Haskell. And what's other... C++, OCaml, etc? I guess a language with complex/complicated design is difficult to be compiled "blazing fast"
Haskell has GHCi, where you can pre-compile modules and play around in the repl with code that is more in flow.
OCaml has a bytecode interpreter, and a repl, thus you can compile only what you need, and do the full compilation for proper releases.
C++, well, yes it is slow, if you don't make use of binary libraries, external templates, incremental compilation and incremental linking, parallel builds, hot code reloading (VC++ and Live++), or REPLs (ROOT/cling, Clang-Repl).
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#60Thank you for that - I’m definitely going to look into it. I realize that I lost the fun in coding. I’m in a different career stage now as well, but just seeing this reminded me of how I started a long time ago implementing snake, learning about graphics mode, double buffering / page flipping etc. Everything felt exciting and so close to really understanding what’s going on. And just seeing the blue text interface re…