Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Ghost Pepper – Local hold-to-talk speech-to-text for macOS

github.com

51–60 of 233 posts

Re: Show HN: Ghost Pepper – Local hold-to-talk speech-to-text for macOS

#51
post #49
post #48

Not sure why I should use this instead of the baked-in OS dictation features (which I use almost daily--just double-tap the world key, and you're there). What's the advantage?

I haven't used this one but WisprFlow is vastly better than the built-in functionality on MacOS. Apple is way behind even startups, even for fundamental AI functionality like transcribing speech

WisprFlow has a lot of good recommendations behind it but the fact they used Delve for SOC2 compliance gives me major pause.

Re: Show HN: Ghost Pepper – Local hold-to-talk speech-to-text for macOS

#52
post #49
post #48

Not sure why I should use this instead of the baked-in OS dictation features (which I use almost daily--just double-tap the world key, and you're there). What's the advantage?

I haven't used this one but WisprFlow is vastly better than the built-in functionality on MacOS. Apple is way behind even startups, even for fundamental AI functionality like transcribing speech

I use the baked in Apple transcription and haven't had any issues. But what I do is usually pretty simple.

What makes the others vastly better?

Re: Show HN: Ghost Pepper – Local hold-to-talk speech-to-text for macOS

#53

I've been looking for the opposite - wanting to dump text and it be read to me, coherently. Anyone have good recommendations?

Sure, Chatterbox TTS Server is rather high quality: https://github.com/devnen/Chatterbox-TTS-Server You could hook it up to some workflow over the local API depending on how you want to dump the text, but the web UI is good too. The Show HN by the author was at: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44145564

Appreciated - thank you.

Re: Show HN: Ghost Pepper – Local hold-to-talk speech-to-text for macOS

#56

That’s awesome! Do you know how it compares to Handy? Handy is open source and local only too. It’s been around a while and what I’ve been using. https://github.com/cjpais/handy

I use handy all day long as a software engineer, and recommended it to all of my team members. I love it.

Re: Show HN: Ghost Pepper – Local hold-to-talk speech-to-text for macOS

#58

That’s awesome! Do you know how it compares to Handy? Handy is open source and local only too. It’s been around a while and what I’ve been using. https://github.com/cjpais/handy

I’d also be interested to know what the impetus was for developing ghost-pepper, which looks relatively recent, given that Handy exists and has been pretty well received. Extra bonus is that Handy lets add an automatic LLM post-processor. This is very handy for the Parakeet V3 model, which can sometimes have issues where it repeats words or makes recognition errors for example, duplicating the recognition of a single…

Yep. Using Handy with Parakeet v3 + a custom coding-tailored prompt to post-process on my 2019 Intel Mac and it's been working great.

Once in a while it will only output a literal space instead of the actual translation, but if I go into the 'history' page the translation is there for me to copy and paste manually. Maybe some pasting bug.

Re: Show HN: Ghost Pepper – Local hold-to-talk speech-to-text for macOS

#59
post #4

Nice one! For Linux folks, I developed https://github.com/goodroot/hyprwhspr . On Linux, there's access to the latest Cohere Transcribe model and it works very, very well. Requires a GPU though. Larger local models generally shouldn't require a subordinate model for clean up. Have you compared WhisperKit to faster-whisper or similar? You might be able to run turbov3 successfully and negate the need for cleanup. Incid…

How does it compare to the more well established https://github.com/cjpais/handy? Are there any stand out features (for either option)? What was the reason for writing your own rather than using or improving existing software?
Post reply on HN