Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: magick.css – Minimalist CSS for Wizards

css.winterveil.net

51–60 of 87 posts

Re: Show HN: magick.css – Minimalist CSS for Wizards

#51
post #14

Is it typical for these frameworks to link to Google fonts in them? It seems like a privacy/tracking issue, or am I offbase?

> It seems like a privacy/tracking issue, or am I offbase?

It absolutely is, and if you do include them you have to show a consent popup in the EU.

Re: Show HN: magick.css – Minimalist CSS for Wizards

#54
Why do all css frameworks and design systems hate text inputs so much?

Here: Instead of using common sense Google ended up doing a user study with 800 participants to arrive at the conclusion that text inputs must look like text inputs https://medium.com/google-design/the-evolution-of-material-d...

Re: Show HN: magick.css – Minimalist CSS for Wizards

#55
post #39
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The font doesn't seem that great to me. Not sure exactly why but while it's not quite difficult for me to read, it's not as easy as other common fonts.

I think that's kind of the whole point. It is introducing an ambience, it is deliberately made quirky and irregular like the handwriting of some. It is not a common font and that means our eyes are going to be slightly unused to reading it.

The font is fine, it's the line-height that is wrong: the text is a bit too squished

Re: Show HN: magick.css – Minimalist CSS for Wizards

#57
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is a tremendously useful utility. Only annoyed they do not provide builds so I am going to have to install the Go tooling and/or re-implement my own half-baked version.

That’s a pretty unfair thing to get annoyed about when someone is providing you software for free. Worst case scenario, build it yourself inside on of the official Go docker containers.

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: magick.css – Minimalist CSS for Wizards

#58

No. Please don't put script fonts in uppercase. It's absolute death to readability. Actually don't put anything in uppercase - like underlining, it's a form of emphasis that has its origins in typewriters, which were locked to one typeface. The uppercase letterforms are too similar -- there is no variation in the heights of the letters, so your eye finds it harder to read. Upper and lower case, you have letters like…

Hmm, yes, this does break a rule of legibility. It's harder to read than it could be.

However, in doing so, it also creates a distinctive style.

I think I like it.

Post reply on HN