Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Fake or real? Try our AI image detector

trial.nuanced.dev

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: Show HN: Fake or real? Try our AI image detector

#51

I was thinking about this the other day. The issue is if you have an imperfect test to detect fakes, it gives even more credibility to fakes that pass the test. If there are no tests however, then were left to question the validity of everything

Continuing this thought, consider a photo may be genuine but the actual scene is faked. Will pass all tests.

Re: Show HN: Fake or real? Try our AI image detector

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right exactly, much like p hacking with studies. Publish enough research papers and you get significant results by chance, and it gets into a headline as "Science shows..." and people believe it. Unfortunately in this space the amount of deepfakes we can create is massive, so even a system thats 99.999% accurate will leave a lot of fakes through and grant them credibility. I think we have to focus on an alternative p…

I'm not even sure the "digital fingerprint" is entirely helpful. Have you seen the moon issue? https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/11nzrb0/samsung_sp...

I ended up reading that whole thing, but by digital fingerprint I meant something like embedding a cryptographic checksum in an image. Or some way of proving an image is produced by a specific camera. Itd be great for example if we could verify a security image video was real and not a fake
Post reply on HN