Show HN: A Dalle-3 and GPT4-Vision feedback loop

// also, it's the best way - TY @z991

1. You start by describing a thing. 2. The next person draws a picture of it. 3. The next next person describes the picture. repeat steps 2 and 3 until everyone has either drawn or described the picture.

You then compare the first and last description... and look over the pictures. One of the best ever was:

Draw a penguin. The first picture was a penguin with a light shadow.

After going around five rounds, the final description was "a pidgeon stabbed with a fork in a pool of blood in Chicago"

I'm still trying to figure out how Chicago got in there.

At the same time, it perfectly illustrates my main issue with these AI art tools: they very often generate pictures that are interesting to look at while very rarely generating exactly what you want them to.

I imagine a study in which participants are asked to create N images of their choosing and rate them from 0-10 on how satisfied they are with the results. One try per image only.

Then each participant rates each other's images on how satisfied with the results based on the prompt.

It should be clear to participants that nobody wins anything from having the "best rated" images. i.e. in some way we should control for participants not overrating their own creations.

I'd wager participants will rate their own creations lower than those made by other participants.