But now I realize these things should also be collected to a list somewhere. I linked your project in mine for starters. Thanks for sharing! Cheers!
Show HN: Wiv.js – A library for a more wiggly div
51–58 of 58 posts
Re: Show HN: Wiv.js – A library for a more wiggly div
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
It might still catch on on https://neocities.org/
neocities is rad https://coughdrop.neocities.org/
You're the one who is rad! Thanks for sharing this Christmas gift! :)
(also, I love neocities. Happily donate to it and using it unironically for sharing small things)
Re: Show HN: Wiv.js – A library for a more wiggly div
#53I have been looking for these kinds of things! A month ago I started building a similar project: http://dsalaj.com/quirky-ux/ But now I realize these things should also be collected to a list somewhere. I linked your project in mine for starters. Thanks for sharing! Cheers!
Like an awesome list? What should it be called? awesome-oldschool maybe?
Re: Show HN: Wiv.js – A library for a more wiggly div
#54I have been looking for these kinds of things! A month ago I started building a similar project: http://dsalaj.com/quirky-ux/ But now I realize these things should also be collected to a list somewhere. I linked your project in mine for starters. Thanks for sharing! Cheers!
> But now I realize these things should also be collected to a list somewhere. Like an awesome list? What should it be called? awesome-oldschool maybe?
tl;dr ...websites with a lots of character which break best practice guidelines and design rules are able to capture audience better and produce better results (turnover, traffic, user retention, etc.)
So I ended up finding a neutral sounding word: QUIRKY - having or characterized by peculiar or unexpected traits or aspects.
I would gladly reformat quirky-ux to be primarely this collestion/list of quirky stuff, but maybe awesome-quirky makes more sense or awesome-quirky-ui or something similar...
Re: Show HN: Wiv.js – A library for a more wiggly div
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But now I realize these things should also be collected to a list somewhere. Like an awesome list? What should it be called? awesome-oldschool maybe?
Well... I've been thinking a lot about this terminology. On one hand it is useless/oldschool/ugly/trash/weird kind of effect, but on the other hand it can be extremely effective (like described in motivation of my quirky-ux (see talk by Vitaly Friedman of smashingmagazine)). tl;dr ...websites with a lots of character which break best practice guidelines and design rules are able to capture audience better and produce…
Re: Show HN: Wiv.js – A library for a more wiggly div
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well... I've been thinking a lot about this terminology. On one hand it is useless/oldschool/ugly/trash/weird kind of effect, but on the other hand it can be extremely effective (like described in motivation of my quirky-ux (see talk by Vitaly Friedman of smashingmagazine)). tl;dr ...websites with a lots of character which break best practice guidelines and design rules are able to capture audience better and produce…
Quirky sounds apt. How about awesome-quirksmode as a historical reference? :P
Please contribute! If you really prefer the name awesome-quirksmode I have no problem with renaming the repo or adding you as a contributor so you can do it. Thanks for the feedback!
Re: Show HN: Wiv.js – A library for a more wiggly div
#57move these things into initWiv() and cache them: var speed = parseFloat(wivCurve.parentNode.dataset.wivSpeed) var height = parseFloat(wivCurve.parentNode.dataset.wivHeight) var tightness = parseFloat(wivCurve.parentNode.dataset.wivTightness) var thickness = parseFloat(wivCurve.parentNode.dataset.wivThickness) var ctx = wivCurve.getContext("2d"); do this once on init, the canvas context remembers it anyway: ctx.stroke…
Thank you for the thoughtful code review. It is already running smoother https://github.com/jjkaufman/wiv.js/pull/5 if you are curious
Re: Show HN: Wiv.js – A library for a more wiggly div
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quirky sounds apt. How about awesome-quirksmode as a historical reference? :P
Cool. I would say awesome-quirks sounds a bit better and also avoids the confusion with the meaning of quirks mode, the compatibility feature of browsers. I have created the list: https://github.com/dsalaj/awesome-quirks Please contribute! If you really prefer the name awesome-quirksmode I have no problem with renaming the repo or adding you as a contributor so you can do it. Thanks for the feedback!