Show HN: Discover, Listen and Discuss Classical Music

Post by voicedYoda » Wed, Dec 06, 2017, 4:00 PM UTC

ClassicalmOnly wrote: post #17

tmoravec wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Love to see this! As a classical music fan, I'm frustrated by how difficult it is to find good quality music online. Here's a couple of ideas how to improve the tool: * Links to Spotify, Deezer, et al. would be great (I particularly care about Deezer, because they offer(ed) the most comprehensive selection of classical music). * I'm missing interprets. Search for "Karajan" yields nothing, yet Karajan is a super impor…

Thank you! I am really glad you like it > Links to Spotify, Deezer, et al I am planning to do that. However, Youtube will remain the default. I guess that Spotify has some limitiations (must be loggenot in, limitations outside the US, I doubt that many obscure works have recordings) > missing interprets. Search for "Karajan" yields nothing The search currently works for composers only. But it will expanded soon to mu…

Post by ClassicalmOnly » Wed, Dec 06, 2017, 4:09 PM UTC

voicedYoda wrote: post #51

ClassicalmOnly wrote: post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank you! I am really glad you like it > Links to Spotify, Deezer, et al I am planning to do that. However, Youtube will remain the default. I guess that Spotify has some limitiations (must be loggenot in, limitations outside the US, I doubt that many obscure works have recordings) > missing interprets. Search for "Karajan" yields nothing The search currently works for composers only. But it will expanded soon to mu…

> “Karajan” Karajan is a conductor. Will conductors get looped in as well? Or will they be considered “Performers” as well?

Post by Raphmedia » Wed, Dec 06, 2017, 4:24 PM UTC

ClassicalmOnly wrote: post #46

Raphmedia wrote: post #38

https://classicalmusiconly.com/auth/social/complete/facebook gave me an error 500

That's weird, I will look into the logs and see what can be done. Thanks Raphmedia for reporting.

Post by ClassicalmOnly » Wed, Dec 06, 2017, 4:35 PM UTC

Raphmedia wrote: post #55

ClassicalmOnly wrote: post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's weird, I will look into the logs and see what can be done. Thanks Raphmedia for reporting.

Using create by email gives me (in chrome network console) "account already exists" and trying to log with that account sends a call which is never answered. Perhaps it's the HN hug messing your website up...

Post by Raphmedia » Wed, Dec 06, 2017, 4:42 PM UTC

ClassicalmOnly wrote: post #57

Raphmedia wrote: post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Using create by email gives me (in chrome network console) "account already exists" and trying to log with that account sends a call which is never answered. Perhaps it's the HN hug messing your website up...

You cannot create a new user by email currently. This is for already registered users who want to login only using their emails because they forgot the password or username or don't want to type them.