Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have a plugin for IntelliJ's Webstorm/Phpstorm that does just this and it's amazing - whenever I use an item that has a shortcut it pops open that short cut so I can slowly learn them. If I also use something that doesn't have a shortcut 3 times within the programs running then it asks me if I want to set a shortcut for that action. I think as time goes on Google will eventually be on this route considering how wel…
What plugin is that? Sounds like that'd actually come in pretty handy!
Show HN: “OK Google” – Explore Google Now voice commands
51–60 of 122 posts
Re: Show HN: “OK Google” – Explore Google Now voice commands
#52I think this is great, and at the same time highlights a usability problem with conversational interfaces: we don't know how to make them discoverable. Google attempts to do this by letting you stumble upon commands, but I don't think that is good enough. I don't think tutorials are either, but I don't have any solid alternatives.
Like if you ask Google Now "Can you help me set a reminder", it prompts you for details. That isn't discoverable per se, but it addresses a lot of the same problems, the user only has to understand that the system can answer questions about capabilities to have that conversation.
Re: Show HN: “OK Google” – Explore Google Now voice commands
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
How about, when you perform an action manually it says "by the way, in future you can just tell me to ..."
Like how google apps tell you to use the keyboard every time you try to copy/paste with your mouse? I hate that so much!
Re: Show HN: “OK Google” – Explore Google Now voice commands
#54I used to love using the "remind me to" command. It was a fast and convenient way to set alarms. Recently, when I attempted to use it on iOS, I was hit with an alert that "reminders have been moved to the Calendar app," where it is far less convenient to set up a reminder. Instead of just setting the alarm with my voice and then confirming it, I have to use a click wheel to set the time, and it takes like three more…
And this ecosystem thinking is why I'm shying away from Google products. I used to like them because each web-app had a different account tied to each one, and was standalone. And their android apps would let you pick and choose which app handled which jobs. But now they they are trying to move everything under one account umbrella, and force all of their apps to be the only one. No thanks Google, I chose android because you didn't do that.
Re: Show HN: “OK Google” – Explore Google Now voice commands
#55I think this is great, and at the same time highlights a usability problem with conversational interfaces: we don't know how to make them discoverable. Google attempts to do this by letting you stumble upon commands, but I don't think that is good enough. I don't think tutorials are either, but I don't have any solid alternatives.
How about, when you perform an action manually it says "by the way, in future you can just tell me to ..."
Re: Show HN: “OK Google” – Explore Google Now voice commands
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Using Google in the domain name alone is enough for it to be taken down.
On the other hand: http://www.paypalsucks.com
Re: Show HN: “OK Google” – Explore Google Now voice commands
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not a static list, though: mouse over or click on the entries.
I just get another element when I click but the question remains the same. Is there anything more? Looking at the source, I guess, for example, that the questions "How old is X" are all where X is "Adam Sandler", "Adele", "Akon", "Alec Baldwin" "Alicia Keys", "Alyssa Milano", "Angelina Jolie", "Ashton Kutcher", "Avril Lavigne", "Barack Obama", "Barbra Streisand", "Ben Stiller", "Beyonce", "Bill Gates", "Bob Marley",…
Re: Show HN: “OK Google” – Explore Google Now voice commands
#58Technologies used for a static list (!): react redux reselect aphrodite material-ui stylz redux-form react-helmet webpack faker lodash moment
Do you actually have a problem that any of those are causing? I mean the site comes in at around 500kb transferred. That's not small, but it's also not obscenely large. A single large-ish image can easily blow that out of the water. Yeah, it could afford to lose some weight in the javascript (although looking at it now, i'm not sure they can. much of the size of the javascript is string literals for all of the option…
> Do you actually have a problem that any of those are causing?
Inability to select the text.Re: Show HN: “OK Google” – Explore Google Now voice commands
#59remind me [time] to [something]
wake me up at [time]
countdown [amount] minutes
add [something] to my shopping list
I still get happy every time Google Now recognizes them correctly (75%). Being a native speaker and having a faster phone (Moto G) would add a few % I guess.
Re: Show HN: “OK Google” – Explore Google Now voice commands
#60I think this is great, and at the same time highlights a usability problem with conversational interfaces: we don't know how to make them discoverable. Google attempts to do this by letting you stumble upon commands, but I don't think that is good enough. I don't think tutorials are either, but I don't have any solid alternatives.
The conversational UI in text adventure games was fun to explore because the fall backs were sometimes funny.