We've officially come full circle https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224
Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead
41–50 of 219 posts
Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead
#42Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead
#43The selling point of Dropbox/Google Drive isn't the storage itself, but that there's app for mobile and desktop operating systems which deeply integrates it in the OS so it's just like a local folder that's magically synced. So it's a cool project, but not really what I'd say is a Dropbox replacement.
Yep. Open source Dropbox is really Nextcloud - https://nextcloud.com
Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead
#44I pay Dropbox $120 per year for 2TB. No transfer fees, solid Apps, macOS integration, free APIs. How much on S3? A LOT more.
Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead
#45Why not just use an FTP server?
Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead
#46That is a bit like saying “Don’t use a medical analysis app, just interpret your lab results yourself.” Sure, ChatGPT can help, but to use it reliably, you still need enough medical knowledge to ask good questions and evaluate the answers.
(and regarding contributors for all of his projects, it's mostly vibe-coded)
Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead
#47Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead
#48Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead
#49I'd rather control the whole stack, even if it means deploying my own hardware to one or more redundant, off-site locations.
Edit: Are there robust, open source, self-hosted, S3-compliant engines out there reliable and performant enough to be the backend for this?