Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

locker.dev

41–50 of 219 posts

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#42
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honest question, what do you need/use 16TB for? 4K video?

Lots of files with 2160p.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.DV.HDR.H.265-FLUX[TGx] in the name.

Back in my day, we downloaded 20mb episodes of Naruto in .rmvb format and liked it. Uphill!

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#43
post #3

The selling point of Dropbox/Google Drive isn't the storage itself, but that there's app for mobile and desktop operating systems which deeply integrates it in the OS so it's just like a local folder that's magically synced. So it's a cool project, but not really what I'd say is a Dropbox replacement.

Yep. Open source Dropbox is really Nextcloud - https://nextcloud.com

Given how many fuckups sync had over lifetime of it (at one point it basically asked for re-log every day, at other it just corrupted data/didn't finish sync), no

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#44
post #36

I pay Dropbox $120 per year for 2TB. No transfer fees, solid Apps, macOS integration, free APIs. How much on S3? A LOT more.

I think the idea is any s3 compatible api endpoint can be used. The code also clearly supports both backblaze, and more importantly, local blob storage

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#46

That is a bit like saying “Don’t use a medical analysis app, just interpret your lab results yourself.” Sure, ChatGPT can help, but to use it reliably, you still need enough medical knowledge to ask good questions and evaluate the answers.

funny enough the guy behind the project also has an app like that https://github.com/zmeyer44/OpenVitals

(and regarding contributors for all of his projects, it's mostly vibe-coded)

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#47
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lots of files with 2160p.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.DV.HDR.H.265-FLUX[TGx] in the name.

Back in my day, we downloaded 20mb episodes of Naruto in .rmvb format and liked it. Uphill!

both ways!

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#49
Why would I want to replace my reliance on them with reliance on Amazon or another cloud provider?

I'd rather control the whole stack, even if it means deploying my own hardware to one or more redundant, off-site locations.

Edit: Are there robust, open source, self-hosted, S3-compliant engines out there reliable and performant enough to be the backend for this?

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#50
The critical part of Dropbox is not just the storage layer but a combination of their client and server. Even small things like how do you handle conflicting writes to the same file from multiple threads, matter a great deal for data consistency and durability.
Post reply on HN