Why not allow it to be self-hosted or make it a browser extension? Seems cool but I am not gonna trust a random tool with this level of access.
Show HN: Better Hub – A better GitHub experience
41–50 of 52 posts
Re: Show HN: Better Hub – A better GitHub experience
#42Re: Show HN: Better Hub – A better GitHub experience
#43Re: Show HN: Better Hub – A better GitHub experience
#44No lightmode?
Re: Show HN: Better Hub – A better GitHub experience
#45Re: Show HN: Better Hub – A better GitHub experience
#46Re: Show HN: Better Hub – A better GitHub experience
#47Re: Show HN: Better Hub – A better GitHub experience
#48The website doesn't tell me what it does or why it's better. It just wants me to sign-up and provide a bunch of permissions without first selling itself to me. The landing page should clearly communicate what this does and contrast it with GitHub to make it obvious how it's better. I guess the little embedded video might show some of this but it's not very clear. I just see someone faffing about and scrolling up and…
> It just wants me to sign-up and provide a bunch of permissions without first selling itself to me. Yes, and including admin access to all your orgs :)
> Your access token is encrypted and stored securely. Only the permissions you grant will be used.
Re: Show HN: Better Hub – A better GitHub experience
#49Re: Show HN: Better Hub – A better GitHub experience
#50No lightmode?
I will never use dark mode if I can avoid it. The idea that it's somehow better is a bit shady [0][1] (save for mobile devices where arguably it may help save some energy), but I absolutely understand that it can be a personal preference. Multiple discussions already exist on HN on this topic, for example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46664079 [0] https://simplyexplained.com/videos/why-dark-mode-makes-you-s..…