Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Mines.fyi – all the mines in the US in a leaflet visualization

mines.fyi

41–50 of 56 posts

Re: Show HN: Mines.fyi – all the mines in the US in a leaflet visualization

#41

Please reduce the aggregation of map markers. It's not helpful to group every mine in southwest US in a single point in California that makes it look like they are none in any other state. I see this all the time on maps and it's really frustrating. Aggregate markers are helpful when the individual points are actually overlapping on the map, otherwise they obscure location data.

True. Clustering on a map is usually a sign that a map was setup by someone that doesn't use it or has no interest in the data.

[dead]

Re: Show HN: Mines.fyi – all the mines in the US in a leaflet visualization

#42

Please reduce the aggregation of map markers. It's not helpful to group every mine in southwest US in a single point in California that makes it look like they are none in any other state. I see this all the time on maps and it's really frustrating. Aggregate markers are helpful when the individual points are actually overlapping on the map, otherwise they obscure location data.

Strong disagree — aggregate markers were super useful when browsing the map on mobile! Maybe need to add a flag for mobile vs. desktop, but the experience would be a lot worse on mobile without them.

Re: Show HN: Mines.fyi – all the mines in the US in a leaflet visualization

#43

Please reduce the aggregation of map markers. It's not helpful to group every mine in southwest US in a single point in California that makes it look like they are none in any other state. I see this all the time on maps and it's really frustrating. Aggregate markers are helpful when the individual points are actually overlapping on the map, otherwise they obscure location data.

Strong disagree. Zoom in and the clusters break up. Without the clustering, the map is a total mess when zoomed out.

Re: Show HN: Mines.fyi – all the mines in the US in a leaflet visualization

#47

I don't know why, but when I read the title I assumed the map was about landmines. No, these are the cool ones that take stuff out of the ground, not the ones that destroy everything above them

hey now, landmines destroy stuff below them too

Re: Show HN: Mines.fyi – all the mines in the US in a leaflet visualization

#48
under 50, actual underground mines for metals, under 175 total open pit and underground mines for metal the real numbers for rock quarys * are hidden, and I must assume that they are also a small portion of the "total"

* sell actual blocks of stone vs gravel/fill/agregate

Re: Show HN: Mines.fyi – all the mines in the US in a leaflet visualization

#49
post #42

Please reduce the aggregation of map markers. It's not helpful to group every mine in southwest US in a single point in California that makes it look like they are none in any other state. I see this all the time on maps and it's really frustrating. Aggregate markers are helpful when the individual points are actually overlapping on the map, otherwise they obscure location data.

Strong disagree — aggregate markers were super useful when browsing the map on mobile! Maybe need to add a flag for mobile vs. desktop, but the experience would be a lot worse on mobile without them.

I tried it on mobile. The clustering reduces it to 6 points for all of North America. My phone has over 3 million pixels, surely there’s room for more detail than that.

Re: Show HN: Mines.fyi – all the mines in the US in a leaflet visualization

#50

Please reduce the aggregation of map markers. It's not helpful to group every mine in southwest US in a single point in California that makes it look like they are none in any other state. I see this all the time on maps and it's really frustrating. Aggregate markers are helpful when the individual points are actually overlapping on the map, otherwise they obscure location data.

Strong disagree. Zoom in and the clusters break up. Without the clustering, the map is a total mess when zoomed out.

There’s a place for clustering but it doesn’t need to be so aggressive
Post reply on HN