Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I built a synth for my daughter

bitsnpieces.dev

41–50 of 216 posts

Re: Show HN: I built a synth for my daughter

#41
post #15

Another good option for a child: https://www.eltamusic.com/solar-42 On a serious note: https://www.ericasynths.lv/shop/standalone-instruments-1/bul...

Perhaps more realistically, Teenage Engineering products: https://teenage.engineering/store

yes, the pocket operator is a great gift for 8-9+ year olds if you're not as talented as OP :D

Re: Show HN: I built a synth for my daughter

#42

I'm a 44 year old man and I would love this - for years I've tried to dabble with music with much lack of success - but this looks really fun to play with. Great job.

There are also free software synths and DAWs available. GarageBand is the obvious one if you use macOS. I had lots of fun with that and with NanoStudio on iPad. I also own a Pocket Operator, which is fun and very mobile, but a bit pricey.

Re: Show HN: I built a synth for my daughter

#43
post #33

Makes me wonder what the difference, in definition, is between a sequencer and a synthesizer? Is this really a synthesizer, or is it really a sequencer? Yes, I'm splitting hairs about semantics.

A synthesizer is generally a higher-level ready-to-use product containing any number of oscillators, sequencers, and other circuits and bells and whistles under the hood. A device with an oscillator and a sequencer qualifies as a basic synth.

At a lower levels you find modules like sequencer, oscillator, etc. They are generally not used by themselves: you plug a sequencer into an oscillator to make use of it, just like a standalone oscillator by itself simply makes a continuous noise that gets old quickly. A synth does that connection for you and exposes the controls.

(To make things even more fun, the lines between lower-level audio modules are often blurred. For example, the difference between a sequencer and an oscillator can be best summed up as: the former is commonly designed for unipolar control rate signal change where you can specify exact level per step, while the latter is designed for bipolar audio rate signal change between two predetermined extremes—however, as the “designed for” hints, you could configure some sequencers to output a bipolar signal changing so fast it is audible, just like you could run a square wave oscillator so slowly that it becomes a 2-step sequencer.)

Re: Show HN: I built a synth for my daughter

#44
post #30
post #17

Looks amazing! Reminds me of a funny reddit thread about a man who built a fiber optic star ceiling for his daughter. The top comment was "First child?". :) https://www.reddit.com/r/DIY/comments/8g8pce/fiberoptic_star...

Don't assume: Could be an only child, or the spouse is stay-at-home, or the author has family wealth and doesn't need a full time job.

could also be the first child ;)

Re: Show HN: I built a synth for my daughter

#46

I'm a 44 year old man and I would love this - for years I've tried to dabble with music with much lack of success - but this looks really fun to play with. Great job.

I've been messing around making a small web based project that does something similar if you're interested in trying a dabble: https://shantylab.com

Re: Show HN: I built a synth for my daughter

#47
post #32

> A 3D-printed enclosure is fine for a prototype, but a real product likely needs injection-molded parts, which require expensive tooling. For kid-friendly toys, yes. But for older users not necessarily: https://teenage.engineering/products/po

I have two of those. They are great additions to my drawers.

One has a silicon case and is nicer to use though.

Re: Show HN: I built a synth for my daughter

#49
The other day I came across a post on Facebook that was just some guy grousing that the new Teenage Engineering gadget looked like "a baby's activity center". And now we've come full circle: a baby's activity center that's actually not far off from Teenage Engineering kit.
Post reply on HN