Where's the wait list?
Show HN: I'm building a browser for reverse engineers
41–50 of 58 posts
Re: Show HN: I'm building a browser for reverse engineers
#42This article made me consider creating a new CDP domain as a possible option, but tbf I haven't thought about this problem in ages so maybe there's something less stupid that I could do.
Re: Show HN: I'm building a browser for reverse engineers
#43In the past I've considered forking Chromium so every asset that it downloads (images, scripts, etc) is saved somewhere to produce a sort of "passive scraper". This article made me consider creating a new CDP domain as a possible option, but tbf I haven't thought about this problem in ages so maybe there's something less stupid that I could do.
The down sides were that it only works with cached data, and I had to tweak it a couple of times because they changed the format of the cache keys.
Re: Show HN: I'm building a browser for reverse engineers
#44In the past I've considered forking Chromium so every asset that it downloads (images, scripts, etc) is saved somewhere to produce a sort of "passive scraper". This article made me consider creating a new CDP domain as a possible option, but tbf I haven't thought about this problem in ages so maybe there's something less stupid that I could do.
While searching for a tool I found several others asking for something similar, so I'm sure there are quite a few who would be interested in the project if you ever do decide to pick it up.
Re: Show HN: I'm building a browser for reverse engineers
#45Re: Show HN: I'm building a browser for reverse engineers
#46Re: Show HN: I'm building a browser for reverse engineers
#47Re: Show HN: I'm building a browser for reverse engineers
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
no you cannot since you can throw an exception and your proxy will be leaked leading to a detection.
How are you gonna throw an error inside Array.prototype.push?