Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I taught ChatGPT to find cool domain names – with availability check

huehive.co

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

41–49 of 49 posts

Re: Show HN: I taught ChatGPT to find cool domain names – with availability check

#41

Post by aragonite »

Brajeshwar wrote: post #20
tomschwiha wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess that would be too expensive. Even if with all the new domain extensions you can just find an easy alternative.

Well, hypothetically, if they do, then they just buy the `.com` and wait for the Startup/Company to become popular and sell it to them or their competitor(s). So far, any succeeding company beyond a certain clip, always buys the `.com` at a price, eventually.

I wish companies would stop doing that. Zoom(.us) shouldn't have bought zoom.com and Notion(.so) shouldn't have bought notion.com. Not only could they have saved a few million bucks for themselves (& by extension their users) on something which even to this day serves no purpose no other than redirection, but they could also have helped set precedents, reducing pressure on future companies to acquire .com domains.

Re: Show HN: I taught ChatGPT to find cool domain names – with availability check

#44

Post by giancarlostoro »

SketchySeaBeast wrote: post #30
giancarlostoro wrote: post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My only complaint about VS Code is the naming. I'll be googling for actual Visual Studio (2021, 2019, 2015, etc) specific things, and find myself with VS Code specific results all the time. I wish Microsoft would have given it a better more SEO friendly name, they didn't learn from naming SQL Server I suppose. Go has the same problem, which annoys me, a search engine company didn't think that one through. Please, maj…

I agree that's frustrating, but I doubt Microsoft will be able to ever outdo itself with its .NET Framework/.NET Core/.NET naming convention nonsense.

.NET 7 and beyond consolidates Framework and Core. I think they're going to just stick to just .NET moving forward. Eventually Framework and Core will be EOL'd.

I do agree though, they did it very confusingly.

Re: Show HN: I taught ChatGPT to find cool domain names – with availability check

#45

Post by giancarlostoro »

RexM wrote: post #38
SketchySeaBeast wrote: post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree that's frustrating, but I doubt Microsoft will be able to ever outdo itself with its .NET Framework/.NET Core/.NET naming convention nonsense.

Don’t forget .NET Standard. Their naming for all of this is a disaster.

Standard was supposed to be the in-between for Framework and Core if I'm not mistaken, that will likely be phased out and EOL'd.

Re: Show HN: I taught ChatGPT to find cool domain names – with availability check

#46

Post by SketchySeaBeast »

giancarlostoro wrote: post #44
SketchySeaBeast wrote: post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree that's frustrating, but I doubt Microsoft will be able to ever outdo itself with its .NET Framework/.NET Core/.NET naming convention nonsense.

.NET 7 and beyond consolidates Framework and Core. I think they're going to just stick to just .NET moving forward. Eventually Framework and Core will be EOL'd. I do agree though, they did it very confusingly.

It's definitely better sorted now, but as a dev working in the .Net stack during the .Net 2.0 Core time, it was very confusing.

Re: Show HN: I taught ChatGPT to find cool domain names – with availability check

#47

Post by jefc1111 »

jefc1111 wrote: post #39
dutchbrit wrote: post #2

Cool - not sure I'd want my prompt to be seen by others (which you can achieve by changing the incremental id in the url). Maybe use a uuid instead if you want to make it shareable?

Upvoted as I think it needs to be front and centre that the searches are public.

Ended up finding a Mermaid Diagram(?) generator on the same site (with the same incrementing id vulnerability). I typed in "A LLM" as prompt and got a great response: https://huehive.co/tools/diagrams/5633

Re: Show HN: I taught ChatGPT to find cool domain names – with availability check

#48

Post by jefc1111 »

jefc1111 wrote: post #47
jefc1111 wrote: post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Upvoted as I think it needs to be front and centre that the searches are public.

Ended up finding a Mermaid Diagram(?) generator on the same site (with the same incrementing id vulnerability). I typed in "A LLM" as prompt and got a great response: https://huehive.co/tools/diagrams/5633

Some interesting design decisions going on here! If I type in "cats with hats" at https://huehive.co/tools/domain_search and get redirected to https://huehive.co/tools/domain_search/5643 I can then go to https://huehive.co/tools/diagrams/5643 and it tries to make a Mermaid Diagram for the prompt "cats with hats".

Re: Show HN: I taught ChatGPT to find cool domain names – with availability check

#49

Post by giancarlostoro »

SketchySeaBeast wrote: post #46
giancarlostoro wrote: post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

.NET 7 and beyond consolidates Framework and Core. I think they're going to just stick to just .NET moving forward. Eventually Framework and Core will be EOL'd. I do agree though, they did it very confusingly.

It's definitely better sorted now, but as a dev working in the .Net stack during the .Net 2.0 Core time, it was very confusing.

2.0? ;) I started with 1.0.1, which had very confusing versions like 1.0.1.1 and other weird nonsense... I wanted to scream at Microsoft.
Post reply on HN