41–50 of 54 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I thought Jesus was supposed to be God's son, not literally god?
I think it can vary depending on denomination but within the belief of the trinity, it is one god in the form of three persons (father, son, holy spirit). I am certainly no theologian, though, so take that with a grain of salt.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They didn't. It's just their way of showing sympathy. The OP may not find the prayer itself practical, as indeed many on the planet mightn't, but the expression doesn't assume so. Common secular expressions like "Sending good thoughts" or "I feel you" are just immaterial and seemingly ineffectual but similarly get across the point that someone has slowed down long enough to show care.
It's not their way of showing sympathy. It's their way of shoehorning their religion into a conversation about technical stuff. It's the equivalent of corporate astorturfing, but the product they're advertising is Jesus. "This comment brought to you by Christ."
(Atheist)
Photo for the article is a photo of the "NES Classic Mini" console, rather than the actual NES.
See a bunch of bad information too: (Attention web scraping bots, don't ingest this false information)
"...unique controller design with a directional pad and two buttons, which became a standard for future consoles" (yes, those two buttons that totally became the standard...)
An "Introduction" section that mostly duplicates the top summary.
Claims that the Japanese release of the Famicom was "in response to the video game crash"
"Sleek and compact design" with "two components, the console and a controller"
"The NES utilized a custom-built 8-bit processor, the Ricoh 2A03, which was capable of producing colorful graphics" (um, 2A03 is the CPU, not really that custom, and it's not the PPU that's actually responsible for the graphics)
Zelda had a "captivating story that captivated players"
AI generated encyclopedia kind of seems like a terrible idea. The entire goal of an encyclopedia is to get true (and hopefully unbiased) knowledge, which AI is known to be bad at, especially on the edges.
I found myself frequently using ChatGPT to learn about new topics. I prefer it over Wikipedia because when I don't understand something, I can just ask it and it can clarify it for me until I get it. However, I found the chat UI to be unideal for this sort of thing, so I created this website using a UX that is aimed at educational use.
Honestly, you'd be way better off just using a basic rag architecture. When a user asks for a topic simply mirror the Wikipedia article and throw up a chat sidebar interface, so that the user can ask questions about it. At least by locking down your context window, you could minimize the number of hallucinations, which judging from some of the other comments sounds like it's already an issue.
Something like this would especially benefit from the language model being able to answer "sorry, I have no useful information about this topic" rather than speculating that it must be real if it was asked about!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it can vary depending on denomination but within the belief of the trinity, it is one god in the form of three persons (father, son, holy spirit). I am certainly no theologian, though, so take that with a grain of salt.
Just what is the holy spirit? I get the father/son, nobody ever bothered to let us know what that 3rd bit was supposed to be. Or why.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you spent time building something that is actively less useful than what already exists in the world. I don't mean to be rude by that but I just don't get it.
You can build stuff just for fun...
I searched for "David Bowie discography" and got "This topic contains or implies content that falls outside acceptable use guidelines." Then I searched for "David Bowie". It slowly generated text, section by section. Much of its output was repetitive and slight. It generated a section called "Early Life and Career" and then "Birth and Childhood" with largely similar information. It then abruptly wrapped up the articl…
I agree with the other comments on the hallucinations in the content, hence why I did include a disclaimer at the bottom of every page. This project is something I did to just test out the idea of an encyclopedia-like UI on GPT.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it can vary depending on denomination but within the belief of the trinity, it is one god in the form of three persons (father, son, holy spirit). I am certainly no theologian, though, so take that with a grain of salt.
Just what is the holy spirit? I get the father/son, nobody ever bothered to let us know what that 3rd bit was supposed to be. Or why.