Earlier quoted context omitted.
s/phantom/fathom/ I assume your computer did that? - - - - I'd say computer programming is different than reading comprehension. Compiling is perfectly appropriate for a machine to give you feedback: the process is mechanical and the machine has good information. > Teaching is a frustrating job... Right: that's the problem to solve. (I'm assuming you're not talking about, er, having hired people to be teachers who do…
Totally hear the concern. We have a few thoughts about this: 1). It's an AND not an OR for us. Ello doesn't replace parents at all. In fact, many parents use Ello WITH their kids and report that Ello has opened the doors to the kid reading more with them. 2). Not all parents have the skills to teach their child to read (or the literacy skills), there are also non-native English speakers who use our product and are gr…
I will admit, this does seem like a pretty good use for computers.
I just I hope it's not part of the slippery slope to letting machines do our thinking for us. (Then again, what if they do a better job than we do!?)
I'm curious about how you detect and correct problems with the machine material? E.g. the (presumably automatic) error of substituting "phantom" for "fathom"?
Does your machine take a overconfident stance, or does it understand its own limits and help the child to know that it is not infallible?