I did the same for the FDA drug label database and 100% believe that this the future for search. Semantic search layer for context then the large language layer for human answers. Tip - you don’t actually need GPT-3 level embedding for a decent semantic search. Sentence transformers paired with one of their models is good enough. I like this: https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/multi-qa-MiniLM... - since it’…
Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
41–45 of 45 posts
Re: Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
#42I did the same for the FDA drug label database and 100% believe that this the future for search. Semantic search layer for context then the large language layer for human answers. Tip - you don’t actually need GPT-3 level embedding for a decent semantic search. Sentence transformers paired with one of their models is good enough. I like this: https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/multi-qa-MiniLM... - since it’…
Re: Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
#43This is a really amazing application of GPT. Did you fine tune a gpt3 model? If so, how did you implement its ability to say “I don’t know?”
It's not fine tuned. You literally just add something like "if the answer to the question isn't in the context, say 'I don't know'" It's wild.
Re: Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
#44I did the same for the FDA drug label database and 100% believe that this the future for search. Semantic search layer for context then the large language layer for human answers. Tip - you don’t actually need GPT-3 level embedding for a decent semantic search. Sentence transformers paired with one of their models is good enough. I like this: https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/multi-qa-MiniLM... - since it’…
Did you use the sentence-transformers model as-is or did you need to fine-tune it for medical data?