Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Generate a static website from any back end

sitesauce.app

41–50 of 69 posts

Re: Show HN: Generate a static website from any back end

#41
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you mean extremely impressive for any solo founder, period.

I think you mean extremely impressive for any human, period.

Making it even more impressive for someone who is all 3 ;)

Re: Show HN: Generate a static website from any back end

#42
post #2

...any backend that is a content-heavy website? Or are they somehow also abstracting away the application logic? How is this different from a CDN cache?

I was about to post the same question, it's a very similar, but it seems more complicated than just going with CloudFlare. I think they are pretty close in performance boost, but I wouldn't place my bets yet :)

Re: Show HN: Generate a static website from any back end

#44
post #23

I love this site. It's truly impressive for any solo founder, regardless of the age, let along an 18 year old. Yeah, you kind of rely on the generosity of your vendor (Vercel, in this case), but that's really the only option if you want to keep costs low. I hated Wordpress so much so that I wrote my own CMS + static site generator using a different approach and used it for clients who run sites with 3 million+ visito…

This is a cute story, but what was -actual- the cost (time, monetary and opportunity) in building your own CMS instead of applying basic performance tweaks to an off the shelf system?

Re: Show HN: Generate a static website from any back end

#46
post #44
post #23

I love this site. It's truly impressive for any solo founder, regardless of the age, let along an 18 year old. Yeah, you kind of rely on the generosity of your vendor (Vercel, in this case), but that's really the only option if you want to keep costs low. I hated Wordpress so much so that I wrote my own CMS + static site generator using a different approach and used it for clients who run sites with 3 million+ visito…

This is a cute story, but what was -actual- the cost (time, monetary and opportunity) in building your own CMS instead of applying basic performance tweaks to an off the shelf system?

Well I had to do our corporate team site and got so frustrated with SharePoint that I coded a script in python to generate the html from rst files. It was a couple of days of work. It runs behind nginx and automatically updated on GitHub commit of new content. Bootstrap is very well documented and you can use rst directives for “widgets”. I am in the process of moving to markdown + yaml now to make writing content even easier.

Re: Show HN: Generate a static website from any back end

#48
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you mean extremely impressive for any human, period.

Making it even more impressive for someone who is all 3 ;)

Making it even more impressive, that he has already contributed to 500 open-source projects! https://www.buymeacoffee.com/m1guelpf

Re: Show HN: Generate a static website from any back end

#49
post #46
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a cute story, but what was -actual- the cost (time, monetary and opportunity) in building your own CMS instead of applying basic performance tweaks to an off the shelf system?

Well I had to do our corporate team site and got so frustrated with SharePoint that I coded a script in python to generate the html from rst files. It was a couple of days of work. It runs behind nginx and automatically updated on GitHub commit of new content. Bootstrap is very well documented and you can use rst directives for “widgets”. I am in the process of moving to markdown + yaml now to make writing content ev…

Why not just use any other static site generator like Hugo instead of re-inventing it?

Re: Show HN: Generate a static website from any back end

#50
post #23

I love this site. It's truly impressive for any solo founder, regardless of the age, let along an 18 year old. Yeah, you kind of rely on the generosity of your vendor (Vercel, in this case), but that's really the only option if you want to keep costs low. I hated Wordpress so much so that I wrote my own CMS + static site generator using a different approach and used it for clients who run sites with 3 million+ visito…

Emm.. doesn’t proxy cache give like the same result?
Post reply on HN