Earlier quoted context omitted.
The addition of tags/versions is something that I would kill for in Google Docs. It would make life so much easier in my current role if we had the ability to tag a version so that you can easily see a diff between that specific, tagged version and the current version (rather than just seeing diffs over time as it is currently implemented).
There's an add-on you can get in whatever marketplace they have. But I hate using those because it's not clear to me what these third parties can or can't see. I found it when I realized that despite Google storing extensive change history they hardly do anything with it.
Show HN: Version Control for Microsoft Word
41–50 of 118 posts
Re: Show HN: Version Control for Microsoft Word
#42So Google Docs? It seems close enough. What's the main advantage over Google Docs?
Can't use Google Docs offline for one
Re: Show HN: Version Control for Microsoft Word
#43Re: Show HN: Version Control for Microsoft Word
#44Re: Show HN: Version Control for Microsoft Word
#45How big do you think the intersection is of people who can use git and people who want to use Microsoft Word?
Re: Show HN: Version Control for Microsoft Word
#46Re: Show HN: Version Control for Microsoft Word
#47I work in legal and compliance technology, and it is very important to keep documents secured internally if the have confidential information.
Re: Show HN: Version Control for Microsoft Word
#48Re: Show HN: Version Control for Microsoft Word
#49How big do you think the intersection is of people who can use git and people who want to use Microsoft Word?
It includes at least me :) I switched to Latex for writing my second master thesis because I wanted to use version control but Word is far more easier to deal with when the document include unicode character outside the BMP. So I really wanted Word + git from that time. Also when collaborating for writing a paper with Word, version control can be a huge help.
Re: Show HN: Version Control for Microsoft Word
#50Congratulations on your launch! Other folks have provided a bunch of commentary on the validity of your idea, so I won't address that. BUT: if this is a good idea, your pricing is far too low for a niche product like this. $10 (or 10 quid) is too low a monthly fee for pretty much any product marketed as a business product. 10 per seat per month is probably also too low, but would be a better starting point. Likely ob…
It's hard enough to train people to use existing baseline document management systems and not simply email these things around.
Also, the fact that you need to use your cloud service is a red-flag for certain clients.