Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is open source. You can see the source. The license is no-license, so you can (only) fork it. That way, people can clone from your username instead of the original author, although that doesn't make any difference as they're all hosted on GitHub.
You seem to be getting downvotes because you don't understand what the term "open source" means, but nobody has offered to explain so: Open source does not just mean you can see the source. From Wikipedia[0]: "Open-source software is computer software with its source code made available with a license in which the copyright holder provides the rights to study, change, and distribute the software to anyone and for any…
In fact, looking closely at that definition, isn't practically nothing open source?
"Open-source software is computer software with its source code made available with a license in which the copyright holder provides the rights to study, change, and distribute the software to anyone and for any purpose."
I.e. public domain? Any other license lives precisely to limit those rights of distribution, no?
Anyway, just pedantry. I see your point. Learn something new every day.