Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Files.md – Open-source alternative to Obsidian

github.com

351–360 of 377 posts

Re: Show HN: Files.md – Open-source alternative to Obsidian

#351
post #274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It saves to sqlite though, not markdown files you can edit on disk.

Why is that a problem if you are already going to be using specific software to interface with your notes don't you want it stored in an optimized foolproof format that is also one the preferred format recommended by library of congress? And if you want always direct edit access and do it often why not then a simple plain text since either way you will be dependent on the software if you like the additional features…

You can use standard markdown links in obsidian, and even wikilinks are often supported (e.g. pulldown-cmark supports them). Or you can configure obsidian to prefer standard markdown links (https://obsidian.md/help/settings#Use%20Wikilinks)

My notes were _already_ a folder of markdown, so I pretty seamlessly moved from VS Code as my notes app to obsidian and could move back to a text editor if obsidian turns evil. This might be part of why I’m less enthusiastic about their canvas thing, but then I was never a mind map or scrap board person anyway.

Re: Show HN: Files.md – Open-source alternative to Obsidian

#352
post #255

Joplin is open source, syncing setup between devices is one login to Dropbox, works for free, with native apps on Windows/OSX/Linux/iOS/Android. It has a bunch of plugins too. If you just need markdown files with syncing, use it rather than paying for Obsidian sync. The 2GB free quota on Dropbox is plenty enough for text (and some screenshots). Or you could self-host obviously. Git while lovely for source code is a h…

Afaik it can be synced to nextcloud out of the box too

S3 as well, I sync with cloudflare r2's free tier and it works great

Re: Show HN: Files.md – Open-source alternative to Obsidian

#353

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, also makes it easy for humans to train on it. That's the point of open source, sharing the knowledge. We'll all make the same shit over and over if noone shares. But if we all share, then the only thing left to make is the unknown.

That doesn't explain why particularly in the AI era software should be easily accessible. All that stuff you said isn't relevant as it applies in the pre-AI era as well.

If anything it matters more. I want both myself and my AI agents to have as much knowledge as possible.

Sharing is always better.

Re: Show HN: Files.md – Open-source alternative to Obsidian

#354

This made me realize that obsidian is *not* opensource, but in a way obsidian made me feel like it was opensource. Obviously now that I researched it, it is quite obvious that it is not, but still it 'feels' like it should be opensource.

I share the same sentiment, although recently my mindset has changed that not everything has to be open source.

Re: Show HN: Files.md – Open-source alternative to Obsidian

#355
This will probably get buried but here’s my shot at a feature or extension request:

The Daily Note.

It’s the only extension I use in Obsidian. I love opening my phone (or on desktop on any platform) and automatically getting a templated note with some of my daily ToDos as a checklist: stretching, exercises, language practice, etc. With a space for adding that day’s one-off ToDos ad priorities.

It’s the sole reason I use Obsidian over anything else - and happily pay for the sync service.

Re: Show HN: Files.md – Open-source alternative to Obsidian

#356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most people paying money for software do, though.

Which is why I think Obsidian is such a weird piece of software. It's free. It doesn't lock your own data behind a paywall. But, it only allows you to modify it in very specific plugin API ways. I pay for software all the time, and I don't expect it to be open source. But for software I don't pay for, I do expect it to be open source.

That is an interesting point, and you are probably not alone in that opinion. From a logical point of view, it makes no sense to me, though. Just view it as a purchase that costs $X, but where the author of the software provided you with a voucher worth $X. Why should not paying anything for the software give you the right to modify and fork it as you like, whereas you accept that constraint for software you paid for? Just accept that there is free software which is not open-source. You don't have to "buy" it.

Re: Show HN: Files.md – Open-source alternative to Obsidian

#360
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There is no better interface for text than a terminal It's a personal choice that cannot be imposed on everyone. Not everyone is a developer.

So, I suggest you https://github.com/RivoLink/leaf

cool but https://github.com/bahdotsh/mdterm even has remote image support : D
Post reply on HN