Show HN: Save Memory in Google Chrome
31–40 of 298 posts
Re: Show HN: Save Memory in Google Chrome
#32Re: Show HN: Save Memory in Google Chrome
#33I refuse to compromise on functionality because Chrome can't get its memory deal together.
Re: Show HN: Save Memory in Google Chrome
#34I wouldn't mind having a side tray or list of temporary bookmarks that I could easily add to, restore from, or remove. Then I would have 3 or 4 active tabs and about 15 inactive tabs and could swap between them easily.
I know it is possible with shift + cmd + D, as one commenter pointed out, to bookmark all tabs temporarily but that would get cumbersome if you were constantly changing out tabs.
Re: Show HN: Save Memory in Google Chrome
#35Re: Show HN: Save Memory in Google Chrome
#36Open-sourced here: https://github.com/jsvine/tab-bankrupter
As the name suggests, it's aimed more at the mental — rather than computational — weight of tabs.
Re: Show HN: Save Memory in Google Chrome
#37Edit: This is not meant to sound discouraging to the developer; I just suspect he solved the wrong problem. I find it very strange that a tool exists to reduce chrome's memory footprint by closing tabs. This does not seem to be the right solution to any problem I can think of. If memory consumption is what bugs you, maybe you should use a browser that consumes less memory per open tab. If the number of open tabs is w…
Re: Show HN: Save Memory in Google Chrome
#38Isn't 95% reduction claim a bit too bold? It is widely known that standard measurement of Google Chrome's memory consumption with task manager is wrong because it doesn't take data sharing between processes into consideration. How was the 95% figure produced?
Ninja edit: note the disclaimer at the bottom of chrome://memory:
(Note: Due to memory sharing between processes,
summing memory usage does not give total memory usage.)Re: Show HN: Save Memory in Google Chrome
#39Re: Show HN: Save Memory in Google Chrome
#40This is the equivalent of closing all tabs, with the added bonus of having a list of what you just closed. I refuse to compromise on functionality because Chrome can't get its memory deal together.