Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: AI agents run my one-person company on Gemini's free tier – $0/month

news.ycombinator.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 44 posts

Re: Show HN: AI agents run my one-person company on Gemini's free tier – $0/month

#31

Post by veunes »

jimmis wrote: post #12
brunohaid wrote: post #10

OK, the whats the endgame for flooding the zone with agent outputs question aside: The visualization of what the agents are up to in the "office" on the dashboard is incredibly cute.

I thought so too... but if you refresh the page, it's just a pre-baked animation. A fun idea for somebody though; a little aquarium full of bots doing fake office tasks (I'm sure it's been done already).

"Fake it till you make it" in a nutshell. Half the AI wrappers on the market do the exact same thing: they render pretty activity charts that have absolutely zero correlation with actual VRAM consumption or server-side inference latency

Re: Show HN: AI agents run my one-person company on Gemini's free tier – $0/month

#32

Post by ppcvote »

veunes wrote: post #30

Impressive numbers for a spam bot, but what's the point if the content is generated by an LLM and the comments are written by other agents? The internet is already turning into an endless feedback loop of generated garbage where the only goal is to scrape leads from other bots You're spending 7% of your free tier limit just to keep an "audience" of 27 accounts on life support. The real question is: how many of those…

Fair challenge on the ROI question. Honest origin story: I work in financial services. Every day I need to post updates, share market info, and stay visible to clients — it's part of the job. I built MindThread because I was spending hours on scheduling tools with terrible UX instead of actually talking to people. I was my own first customer. After launching, I realized the same problem exists across Taiwan's financial and insurance industry — thousands of advisors doing the same manual posting grind every day. That's the real market. My view: social media time should be spent on actual conversations, not fighting bad interfaces. The agents handle the repetitive publishing. The human interaction stays human.

Re: Show HN: AI agents run my one-person company on Gemini's free tier – $0/month

#33

Post by ppcvote »

veunes wrote: post #31
jimmis wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought so too... but if you refresh the page, it's just a pre-baked animation. A fun idea for somebody though; a little aquarium full of bots doing fake office tasks (I'm sure it's been done already).

"Fake it till you make it" in a nutshell. Half the AI wrappers on the market do the exact same thing: they render pretty activity charts that have absolutely zero correlation with actual VRAM consumption or server-side inference latency

Guilty as charged on this one. The dashboard visuals are CSS animations — the data behind them isn't live yet. I've been trying to pipe real systemd logs into it but haven't cracked the architecture cleanly enough to ship it. It's on my list, just not done. Should've been clearer about that in the post. Thanks for pushing on it.

Re: Show HN: AI agents run my one-person company on Gemini's free tier – $0/month

#36

Post by ppcvote »

uchibeke wrote: post #34

This is interesting. How do you manage quality? Do you have like a QA bot for the content?

"No dedicated QA bot, but there's a feedback loop built in. Every post's performance data — likes, reposts, views, replies — gets fed back into the prompt templates. We run A/B variations on copy style and posting times, then the system automatically adjusts the prompts based on what's actually working. So quality control is less about checking output before it ships, and more about iterating on what the audience responds to. The data drives the prompt evolution.

Re: Show HN: AI agents run my one-person company on Gemini's free tier – $0/month

#39

Post by ppcvote »

hkonte wrote: post #38

[dead]

Thanks for the insight on prompt drift. You're right — flat prose breaks down fast across iterations. We ended up with a similar solution: a modular spec system where the engine rules (shared across all brands) and theme files (brand-specific: colors, fonts, narrative structure) are separate named documents. The LLM reads both before generating, so roles never bleed across runs. Essentially named blocks, just at the file level instead of XML tags. Will check out flompt — the visual decomposition could be useful for auditing where drift starts.

Re: Show HN: AI agents run my one-person company on Gemini's free tier – $0/month

#40

Post by ppcvote »

RovaAI wrote: post #37

[flagged]

The domain + company name trick is solid — wish I'd known that earlier. And agreed on parsing page source for tech stack detection, it's surprisingly reliable and the cost is literally zero.

The last_engaged timestamp filter is a good catch. We had a similar issue with our scheduling system where a stuck "busy" state caused the entire pipeline to freeze for over a day. Ended up adding a simple guard: any early exit from a busy state must release the lock first. Same philosophy — one cheap filter prevents a cascade of wasted work.

Post reply on HN