Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Jemini – Gemini for the Epstein Files

jmail.world

31–40 of 120 posts

Re: Show HN: Jemini – Gemini for the Epstein Files

#34
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Care to elaborate?

If it's using an LLM it'll make stuff up... about people and sex trafficking.

Well, considering the nature of all this...if there's anything to hasten full unredacted disclosure, we should absolutely encourage that.

Re: Show HN: Jemini – Gemini for the Epstein Files

#35

Interesting stuff! I'm also slowly diving into the whole Epstein thing, mainly focused on a human-curated wiki (at https://corroborators.wiki , still WIP obviously) and I've had some contributors wanting to use AI for basically filling out details automatically. But I'm using LLMs daily for programming, so I know how much they get wrong. So about that specific thing, how do you avoid this particular problems with LLM…

Ask it to cite the document and page, and verify it yourself.

Re: Show HN: Jemini – Gemini for the Epstein Files

#38
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it's using an LLM it'll make stuff up... about people and sex trafficking.

You don't really need a LLM for that. The discourse around the files is filled with allegations/implications of guilt based on spurious factors like number of mentions.

Yeah but that's fucking twitter and reddit, this is supposed to be a verifiable source.

Re: Show HN: Jemini – Gemini for the Epstein Files

#39
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it's using an LLM it'll make stuff up... about people and sex trafficking.

It links to the original documents released by the DOJ. Also, just like LLMs hallucinate and it's up to the person to decide to commit the code into the repo (and they should be held accountable to that), the same applies to people who use this tool to release fake news. Of course, we try to apply as many "ground-truthing" techniques as possible. Journalists of all kinds are using Jmail already for their professional…

They're using jmail because it's source material. An LLM by definition is not source material. I can't believe you're openly saying this.
Post reply on HN