Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: PolliticalScience – Anonymous daily polls with 24-hour windows

polliticalscience.vote

31–40 of 45 posts

Re: Show HN: PolliticalScience – Anonymous daily polls with 24-hour windows

#31
post #9

Cool project! The results of all the archived votes made sense to me, but I was most surprised by this one: > The U.S. was right to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) > 62% Agree - 38% Disagree I didn't know that the WHO had such a negative reputation. We are quite fond of such international institutions in the EU at least (ranging from a force for good to fairly harmless). What's the context? The rest…

One of the reasons is that the US pays for a whole lot of those international institutions, creating policy and governance issues that end up beyond local accountability. The "force for good, or fairly harmless" rubric changes when it's your money. Then it becomes "why are they spending my money on that bullshit when we have fires to put out at home?" Covid era politicization and the fallout from that has a lot to do…

Thank you that makes sense. I did a bit more research for context:

The US only left in 2020 and then rejoined in 2021, I suppose that’s why I didn’t remember it as a big thing.

The US was also just paying ~15%. It was the biggest governmental funder, with Germany at ~9% as the second. But the WHO is apparently mostly funded by charity donations, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was paying ~5% for instance.

(it’s awkward to list sources on the phone but should be easy to verify)

I do get the sentiment though from the perspective of the US, I don’t mean to argue your points.

Re: Show HN: PolliticalScience – Anonymous daily polls with 24-hour windows

#32

You should probably say somewhere that the questions are US-centric. For example, "the death penalty should remain legal" doesn't make sense in places where it isn't.

I should probably add that. I do plan to add some more international statements, but yeah, right now it is very U.S.-centric.

Re: Show HN: PolliticalScience – Anonymous daily polls with 24-hour windows

#33
Update: The HN traffic exposed a bug I hadn't caught... static caching of user-specific data in Blazor Server was causing session bleed under load. One comment got attributed to the wrong user. I am pushing a fix now, so the site will be down for a few minutes while it deploys.

If you posted a comment about "people find themselves in situations that shape their fate" and it's not showing under your username, you can email me at hello@polliticalscience.vote and I'll fix it.

Re: Show HN: PolliticalScience – Anonymous daily polls with 24-hour windows

#34
post #33

Update: The HN traffic exposed a bug I hadn't caught... static caching of user-specific data in Blazor Server was causing session bleed under load. One comment got attributed to the wrong user. I am pushing a fix now, so the site will be down for a few minutes while it deploys. If you posted a comment about "people find themselves in situations that shape their fate" and it's not showing under your username, you can…

Dang, perfect timing, ran into an issue with GitHub actions being down. Then the container timed out in Azure after manual publish. Should be back up now.

Re: Show HN: PolliticalScience – Anonymous daily polls with 24-hour windows

#36
post #32

You should probably say somewhere that the questions are US-centric. For example, "the death penalty should remain legal" doesn't make sense in places where it isn't.

I should probably add that. I do plan to add some more international statements, but yeah, right now it is very U.S.-centric.

A better question might be "should the death penalty be legal", for that reason. After all, it isn't even legal in about half of the USA.

Re: Show HN: PolliticalScience – Anonymous daily polls with 24-hour windows

#37
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I should probably add that. I do plan to add some more international statements, but yeah, right now it is very U.S.-centric.

A better question might be "should the death penalty be legal" , for that reason. After all, it isn't even legal in about half of the USA.

Hey, you are not wrong. That is technically true. So the way I format the questions are always a statement (not a question) otherwise the response is really Yes/No more so than Agree/Disagree. I prefer agree/disagree because it makes the user take a stance more so than answer a question.

I also always word them in the affirmative. X should Y or X was right to Y or X is Y. This is so users understand the flow and are not tripped up by X should "not" Y.

It doesn't always look clean depending on the topic, but it is focused on sentiment of the statement rather than the specifics (the discussion section could be for that).

Re: Show HN: PolliticalScience – Anonymous daily polls with 24-hour windows

#39

Interesting how the website is called "PoliticalScience" but mainly cares about US Politics

I'm based in the US and trying my best. I'll have some more broad polls at some point. At one question per day, I'll have a hard time getting everything and everyone included.

A lot of the statements are "general" sentiment as well. Social media, drinking age, phones and children at school, death penalty as a whole (even if it does say remain legal), etc...

Any particular international topics you'd find interesting as a poll statement?

Re: Show HN: PolliticalScience – Anonymous daily polls with 24-hour windows

#40
The problem with binary responses vs continuous or discrete responses is that the way the question is worded has a significant impact. If all you can do is agree or disagree, then you likely only get responses from those at either extremity of the opinion line.
Post reply on HN