Earlier quoted context omitted.
Downvote for this web site is a horror movie billboard and zig already has a build system which is zig and that's one of it's neat features.
People are free to knock themselves out with Bazel if they’re into that kind of masochism, but having it as the ONLY way to build your OSS project is a big no.
Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
31–40 of 78 posts
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
The code of the project absolutely does look like it was done with AI lol, it’s a single commit…
[flagged]
Dropping to profanities is not conducive to maintaining an environment that’s facilitating dialogue between its members.
I’ve seen you at least twice call other members here “you idiot”, “get lost”. Etc. Have a hard think as to whether you could rephrase that without the name calling, and if at worse you can’t manage to, you can always ask an LLM to do it for you.
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
I’d invite you to reconsider the kind of language you’re using to interact with other forum members here. Dropping to profanities is not conducive to maintaining an environment that’s facilitating dialogue between its members. I’ve seen you at least twice call other members here “you idiot”, “get lost”. Etc. Have a hard think as to whether you could rephrase that without the name calling, and if at worse you can’t ma…
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
Given that this entire project is a single[1] vibe-coded commit, I really doubt the author bothered buying hardware to test it. [1]: https://github.com/bustermq/bustermq/commits/master/
[flagged]
Who's going to buy that?
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
nobody cares about the website being done with AI because the code of the project itself is not AI you need to touch grass
The code of the project absolutely does look like it was done with AI lol, it’s a single commit…
I do this to avoid having to check e-mail addresses and names in commits - maybe I mistakenly made a commit from my work account etc.
After the “initial” commit making it all public, I start to work “in the open”. I see many others doing it the same way.
That is NOT a reliable indicator of slop!
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
nobody cares about the website being done with AI because the code of the project itself is not AI you need to touch grass
The code of the project absolutely does look like it was done with AI lol, it’s a single commit…
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
The code of the project absolutely does look like it was done with AI lol, it’s a single commit…
[flagged]
Claude isn't, and the zig subreddit is actually full of AI slop projects unfortunately.
And yesterday's front page Zig project was also vibe coded (though in that case the author acknowledged it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46442792)
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Sure, the author just happened to one-shot a project and a landing page on new year's eve. And their writing style is just coincidentally very similar to Claude's. Who's going to buy that?
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anyone can buy a 9950x on Amazon or any tech store, it's consumer hardware.
Given that this entire project is a single[1] vibe-coded commit, I really doubt the author bothered buying hardware to test it. [1]: https://github.com/bustermq/bustermq/commits/master/
Maybe there is a niche market for artisanal software engineering where real humans make holes in punchcards, but I would not bet.
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> 1/ AIs are terrible at Zig Claude isn't, and the zig subreddit is actually full of AI slop projects unfortunately. And yesterday's front page Zig project was also vibe coded (though in that case the author acknowledged it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46442792 )
Is the only zig community that Andrew Kelley "anti-endorses"[1]:
> I don’t have the time or energy to evaluate most Zig communities so I can neither endorse nor anti-endorse them, however, the Zig subreddit is an exception.
> It’s an awful place and I stand by my decision to permanently close it. I am unhappy that it was reopened against my will.