I learned the other day ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46184676 ) that people who aren't students apparently use LeetCode too, for recreational purposes? I'm not sure why you'd work on someone else's imaginary problem instead of doing something for yourself, so apparently it's there and some people enjoy it, regardless of my understanding of it. But then I don't know how to reconcile the idea that some people…
Show HN: AlgoDrill – Interactive drills to stop forgetting LeetCode patterns
31–40 of 118 posts
Re: Show HN: AlgoDrill – Interactive drills to stop forgetting LeetCode patterns
#32now the same people in the industry advocating for leetcode are also advocating for vibecoding. I wonder if an LLM is made to do leetcode before approval for vibecoding.
day in day out, the software gets worse, delayed, shipped with bugs, very slow yet yeah prove to us you can build software by doing puzzles
if you advocate for leetcode - fxxk yxx.
Re: Show HN: AlgoDrill – Interactive drills to stop forgetting LeetCode patterns
#33Re: Show HN: AlgoDrill – Interactive drills to stop forgetting LeetCode patterns
#34Any company using leetcode as their primary way to assess competency is time wasting, soulless black hole unworthy of any real talent.
Re: Show HN: AlgoDrill – Interactive drills to stop forgetting LeetCode patterns
#35Any company using leetcode as their primary way to assess competency is time wasting, soulless black hole unworthy of any real talent.
Re: Show HN: AlgoDrill – Interactive drills to stop forgetting LeetCode patterns
#36Re: Show HN: AlgoDrill – Interactive drills to stop forgetting LeetCode patterns
#37Please stop with the false urgency and borderline lying to people saying there are 17 spots when they most likely aren't.
Doing this to sell more is unethical and dishonest.
I think if this project didn't do this it might work and go far.
Re: Show HN: AlgoDrill – Interactive drills to stop forgetting LeetCode patterns
#38I like the idea, and you've got yourself a customer :) The lifetime membership + launch discount was a good marketing bait I felt for. Not really understanding the negativity here. We know for a fact that most of the people that master intellectual problems do so via pattern recognition, not by reasoning. You show a chess master a position, he/she can instantly tell you what the best moves are without "thinking" or "…
Thank you, I really appreciate you signing up. I agree with you on pattern recognition. AlgoDrill is built around taking patterns people already understand and turning them into something their hands can write quickly under pressure. You rebuild the solution line by line with active recall, small objectives, and first principles explanations after each step, so it is more than just memorizing code. You are also right…
Re: Show HN: AlgoDrill – Interactive drills to stop forgetting LeetCode patterns
#39I like the idea, and you've got yourself a customer :) The lifetime membership + launch discount was a good marketing bait I felt for. Not really understanding the negativity here. We know for a fact that most of the people that master intellectual problems do so via pattern recognition, not by reasoning. You show a chess master a position, he/she can instantly tell you what the best moves are without "thinking" or "…
I don't know if I feel any negativity, but this is the first time I actually thought 'the price of subscription is approximately equal the price of Opus tokens needed to build a custom version of this for myself'... and got a bit scared TBH
this is probably not accidental.
Re: Show HN: AlgoDrill – Interactive drills to stop forgetting LeetCode patterns
#40Any company using leetcode as their primary way to assess competency is time wasting, soulless black hole unworthy of any real talent.
* Take home projects filter out people with busy lives. Wastes 100 people's time to hire 1 person. Can't be sure they didn't cheat. No incentives to stop company from giving you a 10 hour assignment and then not looking at it. The candidate with the most time to waste wins.
* Relying on academic credentials unfairly favors people from privileged backgrounds and doesn't necessarily correlate with skill as an engineer.
* Skipping the tech interview and just talking about the candidate's experience is prone to favoring bullshitters, plus you'll miss smart people who haven't had their lucky break yet.
* Asking "practical" questions tends to eliminate people without familiarity with your problem domain or tech stack.
* We all know how asking riddles and brainteasers worked out.
With leetcode, the curriculum is known up front and I have some assurance that the company has at least has some skin in the game when they schedule an engineer to evaluate me. It also tests your general knowledge and in some part intelligence as opposed to testing that you have some very narrow experience that happens to overlap with the job description.