Honestly, it shouldn't matter whether you took 10 days or 10 yrs. If its good its good.
[flagged]
Show HN: 10 Years to Build a Free SQL Editor
31–40 of 101 posts
Re: Show HN: 10 Years to Build a Free SQL Editor
#32Apache 2 license that requires email registration. I don't think such a thing exists.
[flagged]
Re: Show HN: 10 Years to Build a Free SQL Editor
#33The messaging is quite confusing. The title makes it seem like it took you ten years to release a first version, but the website says it’s version 3.0 and claims it’s “the leading SQL Editor […]”¹. There is a GitHub repo² but the history is quite unhelpful, with a bunch of commits named the same and some older commits after newer ones. ¹ Unless it were the only one, it would be impossible to be leading right after la…
[deleted]
Re: Show HN: 10 Years to Build a Free SQL Editor
#34Honestly, it shouldn't matter whether you took 10 days or 10 yrs. If its good its good.
[deleted]
Re: Show HN: 10 Years to Build a Free SQL Editor
#35App crashes when opening the Settings on MacOS Sonoma (M2 Pro).
Re: Show HN: 10 Years to Build a Free SQL Editor
#36Congratulations, 10 years is an impressive effort. With regards to the AI capabilities, there is a lot more opportunity hidden besides text-to-SQL generation like query validation, fixing, optimziation, data generation etc. Perhaps these generators can inspire you: https://www.sqlai.ai/app
Re: Show HN: 10 Years to Build a Free SQL Editor
#37Ten years in the making and the main features are AI-based. Amazing timing.
Re: Show HN: 10 Years to Build a Free SQL Editor
#38Honestly, it shouldn't matter whether you took 10 days or 10 yrs. If its good its good.
The point is to communicate a large amount of personal investment - love, sweat, and tears. As opposed to someone who scraped together some side project in a weekend and hasn’t yet faced the demon horde of edge cases.
Re: Show HN: 10 Years to Build a Free SQL Editor
#39The messaging is quite confusing. The title makes it seem like it took you ten years to release a first version, but the website says it’s version 3.0 and claims it’s “the leading SQL Editor […]”¹. There is a GitHub repo² but the history is quite unhelpful, with a bunch of commits named the same and some older commits after newer ones. ¹ Unless it were the only one, it would be impossible to be leading right after la…
Yeah... what's up with these commits that just add a dot or ""? Looks very much like just boosting the commit count.
90% of the commits are just adding nonsense.
update to latest = 21+16
release = 4+1
bugfix = 3+2
update readme = 3+35+35+35+35+35+35+35+14
total = 309 out of 341 commits
The commits stopped at Jun 25, 2016 when it was just a "Custom JDBC Driver and Authenticator Example" and then suddenly Feb 23, 2023 it became "qStudio - Free SQL Analaysis Tool"
Re: Show HN: 10 Years to Build a Free SQL Editor
#40Looks cool.
What is the benefit of registering? I skipped it to try it out.
Was very quick looking at my local MySql database. I liked being able to run sql against some local parquet files.
Would need to support Redshift via an ssh tunnel for me to use it on a regular basis. I don't want to manage the tunnel with a different tool.