Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here's your list - you have to use double newlines: - torrents work if they are shared more than they are leeched, so it's just easier to have it run in the background. There's very little reason to not use the existing client/server models like transmission or tTorrent - indexing and search still relies too much on third parties. Integrate magnetico (passive indexing), bep 33 (dht-based scraping) and bep 51 (dht-bas…
If you use private torrents, chances are you want the swarms you participate in to be private, unless you're happy to announce your IP to RIAA. I do agree though that the current model in which cross-seeding between private swarms is an afterthought and a pain is not perfect. Clients should handle that automatically without having to resort to hardlinks and separate folders and heuristics to find matching torrents an…
Show HN: Mabel – a fancy BitTorrent client for the terminal
31–40 of 60 posts
Re: Show HN: Mabel – a fancy BitTorrent client for the terminal
#32Re: Show HN: Mabel – a fancy BitTorrent client for the terminal
#33I recently learned that transmission got hacked (more than once apparently) so I decided to stop using it. The alternatives seem to be deluge or qbittorrent. I picked the latter because it has labels (and supports moving finished downloads to different folders depending on label), which is a feature I'd always wanted in a torrent client. But my point is it seems to me all the torrent clients seems very similar, barring very minor features.
Anyway, what do you people use and why?
Re: Show HN: Mabel – a fancy BitTorrent client for the terminal
#34Re: Show HN: Mabel – a fancy BitTorrent client for the terminal
#35Re: Show HN: Mabel – a fancy BitTorrent client for the terminal
#36I hope this is a good place to ask: what do people in HN use for torrent client? I recently learned that transmission got hacked (more than once apparently) so I decided to stop using it. The alternatives seem to be deluge or qbittorrent. I picked the latter because it has labels (and supports moving finished downloads to different folders depending on label), which is a feature I'd always wanted in a torrent client.…
Re: Show HN: Mabel – a fancy BitTorrent client for the terminal
#37Looks interesting, why does it require a special font? Suggest you remove the examples of downloading copyrighted content and the yify website from your readme.
The font isn't strictly required – Mabel functions just fine without it, you will just have one or two characters that don't render properly. I suppose we could make Nerd Fonts opt-in via the config, but I don't think it's that unusual an ask. See: https://starship.rs The images in the README have been updated.
Re: Show HN: Mabel – a fancy BitTorrent client for the terminal
#38What is the font used in one of the screenshots ( https://github.com/smmr-software/mabel/blob/main/desert.png )? Looks rock solid!
Re: Show HN: Mabel – a fancy BitTorrent client for the terminal
#39I hope this is a good place to ask: what do people in HN use for torrent client? I recently learned that transmission got hacked (more than once apparently) so I decided to stop using it. The alternatives seem to be deluge or qbittorrent. I picked the latter because it has labels (and supports moving finished downloads to different folders depending on label), which is a feature I'd always wanted in a torrent client.…
Re: Show HN: Mabel – a fancy BitTorrent client for the terminal
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
It looks like there's a few glyphs being used in this application (things like folder icons, etc) that normal fonts aren't going to provide.
Ah - I'm not asking what it's for, I'm asking why isn't it optional. First time I've seen TUI software require installing a font.