Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Wallstreetbets Sentiment Past 24 Hours

wsbsentiment.io

31–40 of 40 posts

Re: Show HN: Wallstreetbets Sentiment Past 24 Hours

#31

Didn't a lot of sentiment analysis/NLP companies already tried to make Wallstreetbets sentiments since forever, and couldn't actually make useful data because of the noise (intentional). The only way today is different is that because these days they are united under singular stock, so its pretty easy. But regular wallstreetbets activity, no chance.

This site has done this, and more:

https://swaggystocks.com/dashboard/home

Re: Show HN: Wallstreetbets Sentiment Past 24 Hours

#33

Didn't a lot of sentiment analysis/NLP companies already tried to make Wallstreetbets sentiments since forever, and couldn't actually make useful data because of the noise (intentional). The only way today is different is that because these days they are united under singular stock, so its pretty easy. But regular wallstreetbets activity, no chance.

This site has done this, and more: https://swaggystocks.com/dashboard/home

That's a really slick website. However it still can't tell the difference between 3 letter words (or 4) that also happen to be symbols. Take for example APPS on the Ticket Sentiment (https://swaggystocks.com/dashboard/wallstreetbets/ticker-sen...). I haven't seen anyone talk about Digital Turbine Inc, but lots of people talking about investing apps. Would be nice if Reddit had some autofill feature that prepended $ to symbols. $APPS vs apps. Perhaps a mod feature they could enable?

Re: Show HN: Wallstreetbets Sentiment Past 24 Hours

#37

Interesting chart. i'd suggest using the same colour for each bar as people will try to read something into the colours if you vary them. Also, "interest" would be more accurate than "sentiment" in its current form.

Oh good point about the colors. Right, someone might attribute green to good and red to bad. Yea, I was struggling to get the right terminology because "interest" might mean "short interest" in the current context of wsb. Thanks for the feedback.

unambiguous “attention” or “mentions” ?

Re: Show HN: Wallstreetbets Sentiment Past 24 Hours

#38

Didn't a lot of sentiment analysis/NLP companies already tried to make Wallstreetbets sentiments since forever, and couldn't actually make useful data because of the noise (intentional). The only way today is different is that because these days they are united under singular stock, so its pretty easy. But regular wallstreetbets activity, no chance.

> and couldn't actually make useful data because of the noise because that's what they told you?

No, its my own deduction. I've been in that site for more than a year and there are a lot of noise and spam stock on purpose to obfuscate sentiment from NLP stuffs. It has a lot of satire in it.

What do you think?

Re: Show HN: Wallstreetbets Sentiment Past 24 Hours

#39

Didn't a lot of sentiment analysis/NLP companies already tried to make Wallstreetbets sentiments since forever, and couldn't actually make useful data because of the noise (intentional). The only way today is different is that because these days they are united under singular stock, so its pretty easy. But regular wallstreetbets activity, no chance.

This site has done this, and more: https://swaggystocks.com/dashboard/home

If that site is really working as intended then there will be no surprise with all of this?

Color me skeptical.

Post reply on HN