31–40 of 58 posts
http://hn.premii.com/ I use this one, and it's been pretty great so far! It has Dark mode and other color options too.
I am getting "Unable to load the content" when I click on a thread, are you getting this? There aren't errors in the log.
If you install https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/dark-reader/eimadp... you get dark mode functionality on any site automatically, no need to create a different website for it. It also has color preferences (hue, contrast, brightness, sepia).
I like it, I would use this as my default. I agree it is slightly too blue for me, I think it should be more red than blue, especially since the purpose is for low-light reading. With that said - if I toggle Dark Mode off, and then click a link, it just goes back to Dark Mode. Probably should persist. Edit: Also, I think the Dark Mode checkbox toggle would be better placed on the profile page, with other related pref…
If you install https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/dark-reader/eimadp... you get dark mode functionality on any site automatically, no need to create a different website for it. It also has color preferences (hue, contrast, brightness, sepia).
For something like this, it should be trivial to do.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@media/pref...
http://hn.premii.com/ I use this one, and it's been pretty great so far! It has Dark mode and other color options too.
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
body {
background: #333;
filter: invert(.95) hue-rotate(190deg);
}
}
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why should't the default dark mode fulfill basic contrast requirements (in this case WCAG AA is absolutely possible)? It's not difficult to achieve, and the same problem would exist if the website was in "dark mode" by default.
I'm sorry if this sounds rude - why don't you create one then?
There are a significant number of low contrast warnings from a cursory glance through an accessibility tool: https://wave.webaim.org/report#/https://jgthms.com/hacker-ne...