Earlier quoted context omitted.
Big Oof on the title.
Thanks! Will fix today, as you can tell we are super early stage. Trying to collect feedback and keep improving.
Show HN: BigOofN – job board from the perspective of software engineers
31–40 of 54 posts
Re: Show HN: BigOofN – job board from the perspective of software engineers
#32Re: Show HN: BigOofN – job board from the perspective of software engineers
#33On mobile the homepages animated "an individual contributor role." text overflows with the button placement. Also when typing in a filter for the location name, the site stutters. This is probably because the JS is trying to filter the whole list on each keypress. You could implement a slight delay before starting a search. I've previously implemented something similar by restarting a timer (clearTimeout + setTimeout…
Lodash.js has a great `_.throttle()` that I use all the time to buffer keypress/state management.
Re: Show HN: BigOofN – job board from the perspective of software engineers
#34May want to update that giant "copyright 2018" on the front page.
Re: Show HN: BigOofN – job board from the perspective of software engineers
#35Love the UI. Where are you pulling these jobs from?
Re: Show HN: BigOofN – job board from the perspective of software engineers
#36Re: Show HN: BigOofN – job board from the perspective of software engineers
#37Re: Show HN: BigOofN – job board from the perspective of software engineers
#38Re: Show HN: BigOofN – job board from the perspective of software engineers
#39First off, congrats on a successful reception on HN. Now, the site layout on mobile needs some love. I would suggest setting up google analytics, and getting some numbers on what percentage of users are hitting this from which device size, and allocate your time accordingly.
Re: Show HN: BigOofN – job board from the perspective of software engineers
#40"FANG" "Unicorn" "Incubators" "Corporate" Ah yes, the four company types. And that's all the company types there are. --- I think that "Famous" "Late" "Mid" "Early" "Seed" would be better categories. You could use Crunchbase or something similar to categorize by what round they are in. That still excludes bootstrapped companies but are much more sane categories in my opinion.
Seems like two different filters are needed: one for size and one for stage. Excluding established/bootstrapped companies is silly unless the purpose of the site is to only list jobs at startups.