31–34 of 34 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
He/she/it hasn't heard of 1920x1200 :) All those devices are 16:9 i think?
Yeah, I need to beef up the devices/resolutions listing. What device(s) have 1920x1200?
What’s the use case for the CSS code? The `padding-top` value doesn’t account for the OS and browser’s chrome (status bar, URL bar, etc.), so the `.inner` element doesn’t fit into the viewport.
For responsive embeds I assume. Where the embedded ".inner" component scales it's height according to it's width.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
For responsive embeds I assume. Where the embedded ".inner" component scales it's height according to it's width.
But why are the aspect ratios based on popular smartphone screens? Notice how on the website, you select a smartphone model, and then the button on the right shows CSS code for creating an aspect ratio that matches that smartphone’s screen. What’s the use case of having an element whose aspect ratio mimics that of popular smartphone screens?
I also see the CSS as an add-on, the devices for me are more for reference, but I have used the CSS here and there for some of the Apple phones.