Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I made a tiny camera with super long battery life

toaster.llc

261–270 of 309 posts

Re: Show HN: I made a tiny camera with super long battery life

#261
post #173
post #166

Great product! Out of topic: I see this trend where people do not capitalize the first letter of their title. Any reason ?

Makes it feel less corporate, more authentic, I feel

Except this is often done by corporations (or their spokesperson) to exploit that feeling. So we’re back to square one.

Re: Show HN: I made a tiny camera with super long battery life

#262
post #30

Why not just use something like Qt to build a native cross platform app? As others have mentioned, advertising a device as open source and yet Mac only is going to turn away a lot of people.

Can he afford Qt? He'd need a lawyer on retainer.

Re: Show HN: I made a tiny camera with super long battery life

#263
post #250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> in a Just Girly Things cursive font. The font isn’t cursive. It’s exactly the same as every other section.

ctrl+f "Exclusively for Mac". There is one hit (though there is another similar message that is not cursive).

Thank you for the correction, I missed that one. At first I thought maybe the one I saw might’ve changed, but a quick trip to the Internet Archive showed it looked like that in April.

Re: Show HN: I made a tiny camera with super long battery life

#264

I don't really understand why this has to be heavily marketed as Mac-only. As an open-source product, restricting the application to the most restricted of consumer operating systems (namely that any consumer hardware can run Linux or Windows, either bare metal or through a VM, whereas only Macs can easily run macOS) seems a bit sad. I had to read through the comments here to realize that as someone who doesn't own a…

I'm not sure I follow the criticism here. Is the issue that a paid product only supports Mac, or an open source project didn't build for multiple OSs? If it's the first; I've seen tons of Mac only software due to the perception that it's a more lucrative platform. (Users are price tolerant for good products). If it's the last; scratch your own itch. Since it's open source you can write the softer yourself. I'm not su…

Looking back, I could have phrased my original comment better, but my criticism is neither of those things. I'm just saying that as an open-source project that has an open-source specification, the author could make it clearer that an interested customer could buy one of these and write their own open-source Linux/Windows implementations as opposed to making it sound like "if you don't own a Mac, this product isn't for you."

Reading the comments, it looks like the author already made a command-line tool that might let the camera work on Linux; why not say that it's Mac-only but community support for other platforms based on the open nature of this camera is appreciated (and provide whatever links [eg. that command-line tool] that were mentioned in this forum)?

Re: Show HN: I made a tiny camera with super long battery life

#265
post #263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ctrl+f "Exclusively for Mac". There is one hit (though there is another similar message that is not cursive).

Thank you for the correction, I missed that one. At first I thought maybe the one I saw might’ve changed, but a quick trip to the Internet Archive showed it looked like that in April.

I would guess you saw the other message:

> Photon Transfer is designed with love exclusively for your Mac

Which isn't cursive

Re: Show HN: I made a tiny camera with super long battery life

#266
post #234

I don't really understand why this has to be heavily marketed as Mac-only. As an open-source product, restricting the application to the most restricted of consumer operating systems (namely that any consumer hardware can run Linux or Windows, either bare metal or through a VM, whereas only Macs can easily run macOS) seems a bit sad. I had to read through the comments here to realize that as someone who doesn't own a…

Strongly agreed. I started scrolling through the website, was somewhat interested, and might have considered it, but just closed the tab when I saw mac only.

Yea I get that it's no BT/Wifi so probably USB. But I don't get why USB would require a mac. I personally like the hardware but don't care about the rebase or whatever software addons he strapped to it. If I just plugged in a USB cord and used any OS to copy off the photos, it would make sense. This is basically the same usage as a thumbdrive or point-and-click camera from early 2000s and shouldn't be limited to a particular OS.... if I'm understanding it correctly

Re: Show HN: I made a tiny camera with super long battery life

#267
post #6

Cool project, here's a few comments after a quick glance over: - There's no license on the code and design files in the Github repo, thus this currently isn't open source but rather "source-available". If you plan to allow others to modify the code and build their own cameras you should add an appropriate license. - The Mac only support (and it's MacOS only, with no iPad/iPhone support) with a dedicated app to operat…

> Linux support is pretty much a requirement Support isn't required for linux: I think there will be people who will be keen to hack up Linux support based on the open source code available, and the same with Windows. However if "Dave" wants access a larger market, Windows or even Android support would make sense.

> Support isn't required for linux: I think there will be people who will be keen to hack up Linux support based on the open source code available, and the same with Windows.

I guess this is more of a marketing thing but I wouldn't be interested in buying this as a Linux user even with the other benefits if it came with unknown DIY support. If you're advertising it as an open source device and such then the people willing to play with it and pay a premium are typically Linux makers/hackers. If it's being sold as a Mac only device with a slick interface and app-only control that appeals to a different market entirely.

Re: Show HN: I made a tiny camera with super long battery life

#268

This looks really cool. I've made my living a photographer for over 30 years and I'm very tempted to purchase. This small form factor would be perfect for a project I'm doing documenting California condors rearing their young. Sadly, I would also need it to shoot video to be effective for my needs (and I'm sure this would kill the battery). Its one of these situations where I setup the camera system in November, and…

There are lots of tiny low-powered video cameras made for use on mini drones.

Re: Show HN: I made a tiny camera with super long battery life

#269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think the camera goes on the motorcycle.

Yeah my plan was to hide it in the garage's rafters. (I ended up moving out of my apartment complex anyway though, so I ended up not needing it for that anyway.)

That makes a lot more sense :) Although you still have the problem of someone potentially finding it.
Post reply on HN