Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's absurd.
FYI Photoshop doesn't work on Linux.. so not so much absurd, as factual
Show HN: Get Paid to Build Your Next Side Project
251–260 of 473 posts
Re: Show HN: Get Paid to Build Your Next Side Project
#252Earlier quoted context omitted.
$400k pays for 3 people.. maybe a couple of more if you hire from a cheaper country. If all GIMP needed was a few more developers to be competitive against PS, that would have happened by now. You're seriously underestimating the amount of work GIMP needs to do.. and/or the amount of work that already goes into GIMP.
This reminds me of the joke about the economist who refuses to pick up the $20 bill on the ground because surely someone else would have already picked it up.
Re: Show HN: Get Paid to Build Your Next Side Project
#253>Monthly subscription for science fiction and fantasy books Isn't that the public library?
I think that the curation aspect of it is also a big thing. Think of this as a "loot crate" for but for books. I think the service should also have _two_ services. One is for great sci-fi fantasy books of all time-- obviously that's going to be cheaper. The more expensive service would be for books that have come out in the last 2 years. For myself, I often look at the winner & nominees for the Hugo and the Nebula fo…
The librarians at my public library are great at making suggestions. They also have themed book displays that they rotate every week (eg. physical fitness one week, high fantasy another etc.)
Re: Show HN: Get Paid to Build Your Next Side Project
#254>Monthly subscription for science fiction and fantasy books Isn't that the public library?
Re: Show HN: Get Paid to Build Your Next Side Project
#255Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Photoshop license is $10/mo according to Adobe's site. $120/yr. Also, $400k is, like, nothing in developer time (compared to what Adobe puts into their software, at least).
You have many hackers already donating their time to work on free software projects, that might be able to do more if they were compensated to do so. $400k is a lot of money to partially compensate people who are already donating much of their time, especially when you consider that you don't have to worry about paying for benefits.
More money may help entice more time to be taken from some of those other things, but some of those are more or less fixed (job, chores), not sustainable to give up for long (sleep, relaxing) or simply not worth a small (or any) amount of money to give up (family).
Enough money and stability that someone can give up their day job -- that's a different story. But that's a very big jump, and suddenly even $400k doesn't really go that far, assuming you can even get that money. There's a reason very few open source projects have a full-time developer being compensated by the community.
Re: Show HN: Get Paid to Build Your Next Side Project
#256Earlier quoted context omitted.
This reminds me of the joke about the economist who refuses to pick up the $20 bill on the ground because surely someone else would have already picked it up.
Yeah, this joke sums up just about every arbitrage situation I think I've found. I think, naw, it must be an illusion, because the market is so efficient... Means I end up paralysed around starting new endeavours.
Re: Show HN: Get Paid to Build Your Next Side Project
#257Earlier quoted context omitted.
$400k pays for 3 people.. maybe a couple of more if you hire from a cheaper country. If all GIMP needed was a few more developers to be competitive against PS, that would have happened by now. You're seriously underestimating the amount of work GIMP needs to do.. and/or the amount of work that already goes into GIMP.
Oh but it is? Do you use the GIMP? Photoshop's content-aware fill first appeared as a third-party open-source plugin for the GIMP. While one certainly can't equate the two I have found GIMP works well for a broad array of digital imagery tasks... just like Photoshop. Much of Photoshop's dominance has to do with the network effects of Adobe's ubiquitous ecosystem as much as the comprehensiveness of their tooling.
Re: Show HN: Get Paid to Build Your Next Side Project
#258Re: Show HN: Get Paid to Build Your Next Side Project
#259Earlier quoted context omitted.
he could always fork it and pay for other developers if the core team didn't want to participate in this. You'd rather the core team's approval and participation, but you don't NEED it.
Call it Pimp. I would say that I'm in too, but I also need a quality Illustrator alternative that works well on Mac.
I use it and love it and it's one of my favourite programs, but really it's better in Linux.
Re: Show HN: Get Paid to Build Your Next Side Project
#260Photoshop license costs $348 a year. If 1000 people get together and put $400 each, you'll get $400000. That money could be used to leverage a Gimp to be more Photoshop-users friendly. Then you don't have to keep with the subscription model. You have a great piece of open source software available for everyone to use as long as they want. You can do another round to get more features added. This solves the issue that…