Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Bionic Reading – Formats text to make it faster to read

bionic-reading.com

241–250 of 281 posts

Re: Show HN: Bionic Reading – Formats text to make it faster to read

#241
post #232
post #22

This does indeed seem to work for me, but the repeated emphasis on the patents and trademarks makes me suspicious. It looks like a company who cares much more about patent royalties than about their invention - whom I would never be willing to give my money to. Having seen the principle, I could write a browser extension in an hour. I suppose I'll have to wait 25 years (or whatever the French patent expiry length is)…

𝐈 𝐜an'𝐭 𝐫ea𝐝 𝐭h𝐞 𝐩anten𝐭. 𝐖ha𝐭 𝐚bou𝐭 𝐬om𝐞 𝐯arian𝐭? 𝐃oe𝐬 𝐭hi𝐬 𝐭ex𝐭 𝐫ea𝐝 𝐛ette𝐫 𝐨𝐫 𝐰ors𝐞? 𝐖𝐡a𝐭 a𝐛ou𝐭 𝐭𝐡i𝐬 𝐭e𝐱𝐭? 𝐖ou𝐥𝐝 a𝐧y𝐭𝐡i𝐧𝐠 𝐰o𝐫𝐤 𝐛e𝐭𝐭e𝐫 𝐭𝐡a𝐧 𝐬i𝐦𝐩𝐥e 𝐩𝐥ai𝐧 𝐭e𝐱𝐭?

Definitely worse. It's the starts of words that are important.

Re: Show HN: Bionic Reading – Formats text to make it faster to read

#242

I am very glad that Bionic Reading is being discussed in HN. I am aware that it cannot help everyone. But I also get a lot of feedback from people who are helped a lot by this reading mode. Imagine you have problems with reading. You don't realize what a huge hurdle that is until you talk to people who are affected. Being ashamed in front of society. The problem of learning new things. Being called stupid. And these…

I spotted a couple of language issues on the webpage. "most concise parts of words" doesn't make sense, as "concise" means brief or short. Maybe you meant "important"? "very great" isn't proper English.

Re: Show HN: Bionic Reading – Formats text to make it faster to read

#243

I’ve used both Bionic Reading while on Reeder, and the Open Dyslexic font while on Kindle, for several years to similar effect. My personal finding is that it makes the work my eyes need to do to keep on the line, and move from line to line easier. But I will note that the largest increase in reading speed for me, up to 800 words per minute, came from single word focusing. There are tools, such as speed reader mode i…

Out of curiosity, how do dyslexic friendly fonts work? Are they easier for everyone, or is it a case of compensating dyslexia related deficits specifically?

There are a couple popular dyslexic-friendly fonts, OpenDyslexic [1] and Dyslexie. [2] My understanding is that the first is free and the second is not.

What they have in common is that both are quite heavy fonts (thick lines), and with a bit of extra kerning (space between letters). They are also designed to have 'b' and 'd' (and other mirror-image pairs) that do not look like mirror images.

I have worked in this field for years, as the founder of BeeLine Reader. [3] We received a lot of requests to offer one of these fonts, and we've used OpenDyslexic for quite some time. I know some people really like it. At the same time, dyslexia researchers (especially those in the US) insist that dyslexia is not a visual condition, and that fonts cannot make a difference.

I tend to believe that even if it is not an issue that is primarily visual, that doesn't meant that adjustments to how text is presented can't make things better. This seems to be the sense among (1) researchers outside the US, (2) individuals with dyslexia worldwide, and (3) many assistive technology or SPED workers in the US — despite what US-based researchers say.

1: https://opendyslexic.org/

2: https://www.dyslexiefont.com/

3: https://www.beelinereader.com

Re: Show HN: Bionic Reading – Formats text to make it faster to read

#244
post #221
post #208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In addition to pronouns, let's include emojis that we feel identify ourselves

> In addition to pronouns, let's include emojis that we feel identify ourselves I assume that was sarcastic, but why not? Do you have any right to choose the emoji to identify me? I mean, you surely have every right to editorialise with an emoji that you think reflects my behaviour, but, if you're going to quote me below a symbolic representation, then I think it's different. If one has to use an emoji to identify so…

Let's just take the emojis away if we all can't get along with them.

Re: Show HN: Bionic Reading – Formats text to make it faster to read

#245
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The opposite is true, in fact - a patent is a monopoly on the patented technology, no matter where alternative implementations come from. You might be thinking of “clean room” techniques which protect against claims of copyright infringement.

> You might be thinking of “clean room” techniques which protect against claims of copyright infringement. Ah yes, that's what I was thinking of -- thanks. Specifically a scene from an episode of Halt and Catch Fire (I won't describe it due to spoilers). That's a real bummer for patents though and makes me wonder how something like Amazon's 1-click checkout was able to be patented. I wonder how "save billing details…

> Amazon's 1-click checkout

For a long time, software patenting law was famously lax. You could basically patent anything software-related if you knew the right legalese. The situation has apparently gotten better after a 2014 SCOTUS ruling, but in the '90s and '00s it was pretty dire.

https://www.eff.org/issues/stupid-patent-month https://www.infoworld.com/article/2608772/the-battle-against...

Re: Show HN: Bionic Reading – Formats text to make it faster to read

#246
I’ve been consistently suspicious of speed-reading solutions. I have a loud inner voice that insists on annunciating everything that is read before comprehension takes place. Speed-reading typically outpaces my inner voice.

Like many others, I scan over sentences multiple times. This has made me more a apt reader technical writing than creative or conversational writing.

Maybe I’m yet another smooth-brain falling for the placebo effect, but I truly perceived an increase in reading speed that did not outpace my inner voice. Nice!

Re: Show HN: Bionic Reading – Formats text to make it faster to read

#247
post #187

> Bionic reading aims to encourage a more in-depth reading and understanding of written content by reading faster? I mean the examples are pretty compelling and it did feel like I was reading faster, but at the same time their goals are at odds - faster reading doesn't necessarily mean more attentive reading, or being able to absorb more information. Still, interesting technique. I just wish they made their examples…

I had better comprehension on the Bionic text right off the bat, personally.

I'm on mobile so maybe that is why, but I noticed that I skipped over the sentence a bit. As in, I didn't notice the periods and comma at first. Would bolding the punctuation marks cause any issues?

Re: Show HN: Bionic Reading – Formats text to make it faster to read

#249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Out of curiosity, how do dyslexic friendly fonts work? Are they easier for everyone, or is it a case of compensating dyslexia related deficits specifically?

There are a couple popular dyslexic-friendly fonts, OpenDyslexic [1] and Dyslexie. [2] My understanding is that the first is free and the second is not. What they have in common is that both are quite heavy fonts (thick lines), and with a bit of extra kerning (space between letters). They are also designed to have 'b' and 'd' (and other mirror-image pairs) that do not look like mirror images. I have worked in this fi…

Do you have any other assistive technology examples other than beeline reader? That thing is absolutely fantastic, I love it.

Re: Show HN: Bionic Reading – Formats text to make it faster to read

#250
post #221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In addition to pronouns, let's include emojis that we feel identify ourselves I assume that was sarcastic, but why not? Do you have any right to choose the emoji to identify me? I mean, you surely have every right to editorialise with an emoji that you think reflects my behaviour, but, if you're going to quote me below a symbolic representation, then I think it's different. If one has to use an emoji to identify so…

Let's just take the emojis away if we all can't get along with them.

It certainly seems clear that renato_cassutt, who it is clear can taken constructive criticism and who has given very useful replies throughout the comments, meant no-one any harm; and neither I nor, I am sure, kranner meant to impute any ill intent. I can understand the appeal of pictorial representations of one's users; I was just, and I suspect that kranner was also, trying to mention the possible inadvertent offence that might result in this way, not to ruin anyone's fun but to save someone from an inadvertent misstep.
Post reply on HN