Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem with LLM-written is that I run into so many README.md's where it's clear the author barely read the thing they're expecting me to read and it's got errors that waste my time and energy. I don't mind it if I have good reason to believe the author actually read the docs, but that's hard to know from someone I don't know on the internet. So I actually really appreciate if you are editing the docs to make the…
The README is for your agent to read. Shrug.
Show HN: NanoClaw – “Clawdbot” in 500 lines of TS with Apple container isolation
221–230 of 239 posts
Re: Show HN: NanoClaw – “Clawdbot” in 500 lines of TS with Apple container isolation
#222Re: Show HN: NanoClaw – “Clawdbot” in 500 lines of TS with Apple container isolation
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
OP here. Yes! This was a big motivation for me to try and build this. Nervous Anthropic is gonna shut down my account for using Clawdbot. This project uses the Agents SDK so it should be kosher in regards to terms of service. I couldn't figure out how to get the SDK running inside the containers to properly use the authenticated session from the host machine so I went with a hacky way of injecting the oauth token int…
I went down this rabbit hole a bit recently trying to use claude inside fence[0] and it seems that on macOS, claude stores this token inside Keychain. I'm not sure there's a way to expose that to a container... my guess would be no, especially since it seems the container is Linux, and also because keeping the Keychain out of reach of containers seems like it would be paramount. But someone might know better! 0: http…
Did you get it working in the end? I assume you didn't share your setup/config anywhere?
Re: Show HN: NanoClaw – “Clawdbot” in 500 lines of TS with Apple container isolation
#224Not seeing how the sandbox prevents anything really. The point of OpenClaw is to connect out to different systems.
Re: Show HN: NanoClaw – “Clawdbot” in 500 lines of TS with Apple container isolation
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
The art department is that way, we do engineering here. Faster is better.
> we do engineering here Well, we make software, at any rate. Most of the time that's pretty divorced from capital-E engineering, which is why we get to be cavalier about the quality of the result - let me know how you feel about the bridges and tunnels you drive on being built "as fast as possible, to hell with safety"
Re: Show HN: NanoClaw – “Clawdbot” in 500 lines of TS with Apple container isolation
#226Re: Show HN: NanoClaw – “Clawdbot” in 500 lines of TS with Apple container isolation
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
> we do engineering here Well, we make software, at any rate. Most of the time that's pretty divorced from capital-E engineering, which is why we get to be cavalier about the quality of the result - let me know how you feel about the bridges and tunnels you drive on being built "as fast as possible, to hell with safety"
Don't put words in my mouth, you don't care about safety not me. And for what it's worth I'm an electrical engineer first, so if you have some inferiority complex about software you don't have to apply it to me.
Re: Show HN: NanoClaw – “Clawdbot” in 500 lines of TS with Apple container isolation
#228The "skills not features" contribution model is the most interesting part of this. Instead of a project that grows into another 52-module beast, contributors teach Claude how to transform the codebase per-user. It's basically contributing build instructions instead of build artifacts. If it actually works in practice, it's a genuinely novel approach to keeping small projects small.
Re: Show HN: NanoClaw – “Clawdbot” in 500 lines of TS with Apple container isolation
#229Great idea and name the danger here which I'll be interested to track is how do you keep this "nano"? Since it's built for you, you'll continue adding features i assume which over time will make this not very nano. I guess I'm wondering if there could be some small design tweaks of the repo that make this usable as a long term "fork the base and make it your own" concept
If I want to add additional capabilities for myself, I'll contribute them to the project as skills for claude code to modify the code base, rather than directly to the source. I actually want to reduce the size of the base implementation and have a PR open to strip out 300-400 LOC
Re: Show HN: NanoClaw – “Clawdbot” in 500 lines of TS with Apple container isolation
#230Stupid stuff openclaw did for me: - Created its own github account, then proceeded to get itself banned (I have no idea what it did, all it said was it created some new repos and opened issues, clearly it must've done a bit more than that to get banned) - Signed up for a Gmail account using a pay as you go sim in an old android handset connected with ADB for sms reading, and again proceeded to get itself banned by ha…
> and again proceeded to get itself banned by hammering the crap out of the docs api > Used approx $2k worth of Kimi tokens Holy shit dude you really should rethink your life decisions this is NUTS