Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 58 posts

Re: Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing

#21
post #11

I love this! Bit of feedback: if I were to use this to share photos taken for a client, I would love a way for my clients to be able to download all the photos in one go.

Yes, that is the biggest feature people have asked for. I'm trying to figure out the best way to do it. Quick question. Would it be ok if you clicked a link and then it emailed you a bit later when the download was ready?

How about bittorrent sync for that purpose?

Re: Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing

#22
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, right now the "view-only" link becomes a collaborative album through a boolean set in the database. I'd be happy to create a separate url if you think that would make it more obvious.

Just thinking out loud but if I went on a hiking trip with a couple of friends and we all wanted to show off an album of pictures to other, it makes sense I would give a view-only link to people who wanted to view the album and an edit link to those who came on the trip to contribute photos. It could be something as simple as selecting "Yes" generates an edit var with the associated link. If someone pastes the edit U…

I actually debated this quite a bit and went back and forth on it. I eventually decided that I wanted to keep it as simple as possible and figured that people might have a bunch of people add photos and then they could switch it to view-only to share with other people. Or they could create a copy of the album that they can reorder and delete extraneous photos that they can share in view-only mode.

I'd certainly consider tweaking it, though, to make it possible to share a view-only and collaborative album simultaneously.

Re: Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing

#23

Looks great. I'd love a way to view full resolution images without having to download it.

Good to know. That wouldn't be too hard to add. Out of curiosity why do you want to view the full-resolution photos vs. the ones that are scaled to fit your screen?

As a user who would also want this feature, I would say it is because you sometimes want to see full detail. If, for example, someone sends you a link to a painting or some old coins you might be buying or whatever.

Re: Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing

#24

This looks great! I love that there is no account required. However, since I can use it without an account, why would I register? You may want to add some motivational copy to the registration page to tell me. Also, these two statements from the "Free" section don't seem to match: * Original, full-size photos are stored for one month. * Full-sized photos can be downloaded for $0.99/album after one month. Maybe the se…

I'm not entirely sure that I care if you register. It might be beneficial, but I'm more concerned about you finding it useful and using it / sharing it with other people. If a lot of people use it anonymously I think it would be fine, although maybe that's naive...

The second line is meant to explain that after one month you can pay $0.99 and download all the full-size photos (before one month you can do that for free). Is that how you understood it?

Re: Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing

#25

The interface is better - but otherwise, how is this superior to imgur ( http://www.imgur.com )? Imgur has obviously already scaled.

imgur is more about sharing a single photo or creating a meme. This is more about creating and sharing an album of photos. The features of SimpleNeat include things like reordering photos, custom urls for albums, easy downloading, and, eventually, easy printing or creating mugs or t-shirts.

It's more about that because those are the most used functions, it's very easy to upload an album, and you can re-arrange,and download them, the custom URL is not possible if you're scaling up that large.

Re: Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, that is the biggest feature people have asked for. I'm trying to figure out the best way to do it. Quick question. Would it be ok if you clicked a link and then it emailed you a bit later when the download was ready?

How about bittorrent sync for that purpose?

I don't know much about bittorrent sync. How does it work?

Re: Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing

#27

This looks great! I love that there is no account required. However, since I can use it without an account, why would I register? You may want to add some motivational copy to the registration page to tell me. Also, these two statements from the "Free" section don't seem to match: * Original, full-size photos are stored for one month. * Full-sized photos can be downloaded for $0.99/album after one month. Maybe the se…

I'm not entirely sure that I care if you register. It might be beneficial, but I'm more concerned about you finding it useful and using it / sharing it with other people. If a lot of people use it anonymously I think it would be fine, although maybe that's naive... The second line is meant to explain that after one month you can pay $0.99 and download all the full-size photos (before one month you can do that for fre…

If a lot of people are using it for free how do you pay for bandwidth?

What happens with the photos if you cannot afford to run the service?

Re: Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good to know. That wouldn't be too hard to add. Out of curiosity why do you want to view the full-resolution photos vs. the ones that are scaled to fit your screen?

As a user who would also want this feature, I would say it is because you sometimes want to see full detail. If, for example, someone sends you a link to a painting or some old coins you might be buying or whatever.

Fair enough. Feature added.

There's now a link next to the "Download Photo" button called "View Original" when you click to view the larger photos.

Update

Unfortunately on Chrome this link doesn't work because the photo is stored in a way that tells Chrome to automatically download the photo. I'll have to dig in to figure out if there is a way to force the photo to be displayed instead of automatically downloaded.

Re: Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not entirely sure that I care if you register. It might be beneficial, but I'm more concerned about you finding it useful and using it / sharing it with other people. If a lot of people use it anonymously I think it would be fine, although maybe that's naive... The second line is meant to explain that after one month you can pay $0.99 and download all the full-size photos (before one month you can do that for fre…

If a lot of people are using it for free how do you pay for bandwidth? What happens with the photos if you cannot afford to run the service?

The cost of storage is very low, so I'm hoping that between some reasonable advertising, pro accounts, and printing services the hosting bill can be covered even with a lot of free accounts. DropBox has done this successfully, so I think it is very possible. Over time the cost of storage will continue to drop as well, making the financial equation more effective...

Re: Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing

#30
Looks good. Only critique I would have:

You say no registration required but next the create album button are sign in and register buttons. I'm sure there would be some users who think they need to register/sign in before clicking the create album button.

I also don't see on the home page what I would get if I did register (even though it's not required).

Post reply on HN