Show HN: mist.io - Cloud management in your pocket • Hacker News Board

Re: Show HN: mist.io - Cloud management in your pocket

#21

Post by cpsaltis » Mon, May 13, 2013, 8:55 PM UTC

skimmas wrote: post #19

put a cloud in your pocket and you'll get cold wet pants

Hehehe, haven't thought of it this way...

Re: Show HN: mist.io - Cloud management in your pocket

#22

Post by krat0sprakhar » Mon, May 13, 2013, 9:08 PM UTC

Any plans of adding Digital Ocean to the list? Looks like a cool service!

Re: Show HN: mist.io - Cloud management in your pocket

#23

Post by tekknolagi » Mon, May 13, 2013, 9:15 PM UTC

When you say API key and API secret for Rackspace... what does that mean? I only see one API secret key in my account.

Re: Show HN: mist.io - Cloud management in your pocket

#24

Post by unweb » Mon, May 13, 2013, 9:19 PM UTC

kamilafsar wrote: post #18

Can you say something about pricing / how you are going to monetize?

Pricing policy will be published pretty soon. There will be 4 tiers depending on the number of managed and monitored servers: free, basic, startup & enterprise.

It will also be possible to get self-hosted installations with support.

Re: Show HN: mist.io - Cloud management in your pocket

#25

Post by unweb » Mon, May 13, 2013, 9:22 PM UTC

tekknolagi wrote: post #23

When you say API key and API secret for Rackspace... what does that mean? I only see one API secret key in my account.

Yes, this is somewhat misleading and will be fixed shortly. API key/API secret is the Amazon way. For Rackspace and Linode just put your username in the API key field and your API key in the API secret field :)

Re: Show HN: mist.io - Cloud management in your pocket

#26

Post by unweb » Mon, May 13, 2013, 9:23 PM UTC

krat0sprakhar wrote: post #22

Any plans of adding Digital Ocean to the list? Looks like a cool service!

We're currently looking into extending support to more cloud providers, including DigitalOcean.

Re: Show HN: mist.io - Cloud management in your pocket

#27

Post by tzikis » Tue, May 14, 2013, 3:43 PM UTC

kodablah wrote: post #3

Too bad it's AGPL. I understand the want to make money while open sourcing at the same time, but I fear this license will scare people. Are the majority of WebFWD sponsored open-source projects choosing this license?

for the record, codebender (WebFWD Class II) is FreeBSD