Show HN: I put a $2.43 necklace on 3 outfits. VLMs priced it at $19 to $104
21–28 of 28 posts
Re: Show HN: I put a $2.43 necklace on 3 outfits. VLMs priced it at $19 to $104
#22SW50cmVzdGluZyBleHBlcmltZW50IC0gZ3JlYXQgZm9yIGEgaGFja2VyIG5ld3MgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbg==
Re: Show HN: I put a $2.43 necklace on 3 outfits. VLMs priced it at $19 to $104
#23SW50cmVzdGluZyBleHBlcmltZW50IC0gZ3JlYXQgZm9yIGEgaGFja2VyIG5ld3MgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbg==
Re: Show HN: I put a $2.43 necklace on 3 outfits. VLMs priced it at $19 to $104
#24A bit off topic, but why are the original author comments flagged to death?
Re: Show HN: I put a $2.43 necklace on 3 outfits. VLMs priced it at $19 to $104
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure what you mean, but I can see the necklace very clearly.
Are you joking? I cant even tell if its silver or gold from this image https://github.com/BraveAnn011/ai-halo-valuation-bias/blob/m...
Re: Show HN: I put a $2.43 necklace on 3 outfits. VLMs priced it at $19 to $104
#26This is an interesting test, but it does seem to me that visual models being able to price things was already kinda unrealistic? It makes me think of the calorie guessing use case. you can't tell the difference between materials and ingredients in a photo, so how will the model? especially "in situ" as part of an outfit or in a finished meal. maybe they could do it if you placed them on a blank table or background to…
Re: Show HN: I put a $2.43 necklace on 3 outfits. VLMs priced it at $19 to $104
#27Jewelry is a veblen good whose price is mostly based on provenance. I'm not sure any classifier could do anything but guess on surrounding context. Insurance classifiers are much less naive than you'd expect, btw. I have designed a few.
Re: Show HN: I put a $2.43 necklace on 3 outfits. VLMs priced it at $19 to $104
#28A bit off topic, but why are the original author comments flagged to death?