Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Startup Equity Adventure Game

options-game-polymathrobotics.pythonanywhere.com

21–30 of 32 posts

Re: Show HN: Startup Equity Adventure Game

#23

Add the effects of "preferred overhang" on employee payouts for various different exit outcomes like acquisitions. Usually only founders and investors with "preferred shares" see anything and those with common stock (employees) see theirs get completely eaten by the overhang.

Depends on the outcome.

If it's a positive outcome, then preference has no role.

This game models good outcomes, with warnings for things like down rounds

Re: Show HN: Startup Equity Adventure Game

#26

Yeah, that’s not how my company operates. I’m maintaining my majority share by splitting only. The VCs can go along, or they can hope their next investment is the unicorn.

Yeah, also seems very US-centric with "outstanding shares". Other countries don't allow you to have outstanding shares. Also, where is the "reinvest" option during series rounds. Like, what founder also doesn't reinvest to keep their equity during fund raising?

This is US centric, it's mentioned on the first page, along with the notes and links.

Reinvesting is a minority, edge case. I can't think of a single VC company in the Bay area that can have founders reinvest shares and not cause issues raising.

Re: Show HN: Startup Equity Adventure Game

#28

It doesn't understand authorized vs issued shares

In practice, for YC or similar Bay area US startups, they are the same.

All authorized shares are issued, and then the charter is amended through board action and more shares are authorized and issued at each stage.

Re: Show HN: Startup Equity Adventure Game

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, also seems very US-centric with "outstanding shares". Other countries don't allow you to have outstanding shares. Also, where is the "reinvest" option during series rounds. Like, what founder also doesn't reinvest to keep their equity during fund raising?

This is US centric, it's mentioned on the first page, along with the notes and links. Reinvesting is a minority, edge case. I can't think of a single VC company in the Bay area that can have founders reinvest shares and not cause issues raising.

"...reinvest shares." I don't understand this. I'm guessing it's my lack of knowledge.

I'd expect "reinvest" to mean "supply more capital to obtain more shares" in an attempt to maintain ownership percentage. The founder would have to already be rather wealthy, or be savvy enough to negotiate some other way to maintain their ownership.

Post reply on HN