Here's my question: if agents continue to get better with RL, what is future proof about this environment or UI? I think we all know that managing 5-10 agents ... is not pretty. Are we really landing good PRs with 100% cognitive focus from 5-10 agents? Chances are, I'm making mistakes (and I assume other humans are too)? Why not 1 agent managing 5-10 agents for you? And so on? Most of the development loop is in bash…
Show HN: Emdash – Open-source agentic development environment
21–30 of 81 posts
Re: Show HN: Emdash – Open-source agentic development environment
#22[dead]
Re: Show HN: Emdash – Open-source agentic development environment
#23Re: Show HN: Emdash – Open-source agentic development environment
#24Here's my question: if agents continue to get better with RL, what is future proof about this environment or UI? I think we all know that managing 5-10 agents ... is not pretty. Are we really landing good PRs with 100% cognitive focus from 5-10 agents? Chances are, I'm making mistakes (and I assume other humans are too)? Why not 1 agent managing 5-10 agents for you? And so on? Most of the development loop is in bash…
Interesting thoughts - thank you! And directionally agree - given that agents are becoming ever better, they'll take more and more of the orchestration on themselves. Still, we believe that developers need an interface to interact with these agents; see their status and review / test their work. Emdash is our approach for building this interface of the future - the ADE :)
CLIs like claude code equally improve over time. tmux helps running remote sessions like there were local.
Why should we invest long time into your „ADE“, really?
> see their status and review / test their work
Won’t that be addressed eventually by the CLIs themselves?
Maybe you’re betting on being purchased by one of the agentic coding providers given your tool has long term value on its own?
Re: Show HN: Emdash – Open-source agentic development environment
#25Re: Show HN: Emdash – Open-source agentic development environment
#26Here's my question: if agents continue to get better with RL, what is future proof about this environment or UI? I think we all know that managing 5-10 agents ... is not pretty. Are we really landing good PRs with 100% cognitive focus from 5-10 agents? Chances are, I'm making mistakes (and I assume other humans are too)? Why not 1 agent managing 5-10 agents for you? And so on? Most of the development loop is in bash…
Re: Show HN: Emdash – Open-source agentic development environment
#27So, what's your business model ? Is this an YC product, or a tool you developed while working on a YC product ?
Re: Show HN: Emdash – Open-source agentic development environment
#28this looks great, but can't test, the .deb package is broken with an issue about NODE_MODULE_VERSION mismatches. There seems to be a PR waiting for approval. Will keep an eye on it.
Re: Show HN: Emdash – Open-source agentic development environment
#29So, what's your business model ? Is this an YC product, or a tool you developed while working on a YC product ?
We're figuring our business model out. There're two avenues that we principally think about (1) bundled coding agent subscription and (2)enterprise version with auth, team management, sharing of agent interactions. Admittedly, it's early and this can change. What won't change is that this UI layer for running multiple coding agents is and will be open-source. Emdash itself is funded by YC. Initially developed as a to…
Re: Show HN: Emdash – Open-source agentic development environment
#30this looks great, but can't test, the .deb package is broken with an issue about NODE_MODULE_VERSION mismatches. There seems to be a PR waiting for approval. Will keep an eye on it.