Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can users stack Quibblers, so Quibbler 2 corrects Quibbler 1 if, say, it fabricates an issue in the code it's reviewing? If so, have you found an optimum number of Quibblers for the Quibbler stack? Also, might users form a Quibbler council such that multiple Quibblers review the same thing and form a consensus before proceeding?
I love the pixel-perfect precision with which this comment is straddling the Poe's Law line. That aside I also love the concept of Quibbler Council and I'd get a kick out of seeing it in action.
Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want
21–29 of 29 posts
Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want
#22Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want
#23An agent's agent?
Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want
#24Is an anthropic api key really necessary? A major roadblock for taking a test drive. Already have a Claud Max subscription but an anthropic api key still need at least 5$/mon extra.
Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want
#25Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want
#26Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want
#27There's so many agents to handle my agents, I'm gonna need agents for my agent agents soon.
Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want
#28Is an anthropic api key really necessary? A major roadblock for taking a test drive. Already have a Claud Max subscription but an anthropic api key still need at least 5$/mon extra.
You could use the prompts in the code to create a Claude Code sub-agent[1], which would do the same thing without an API key 1. https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/sub-agents
Or would the hook invoke another instance of claude code?
I just read through the hook docs and I’m a bit fuzzy on the bidirectionality of it.