Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want

github.com

21–29 of 29 posts

Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can users stack Quibblers, so Quibbler 2 corrects Quibbler 1 if, say, it fabricates an issue in the code it's reviewing? If so, have you found an optimum number of Quibblers for the Quibbler stack? Also, might users form a Quibbler council such that multiple Quibblers review the same thing and form a consensus before proceeding?

I love the pixel-perfect precision with which this comment is straddling the Poe's Law line. That aside I also love the concept of Quibbler Council and I'd get a kick out of seeing it in action.

MoQs - Mixture of Quibblers? Would be convenient to have them run on dedicated FGPAs. Then they can facilitate near real-time quibbing at the network level across all packets.

Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want

#24

Is an anthropic api key really necessary? A major roadblock for taking a test drive. Already have a Claud Max subscription but an anthropic api key still need at least 5$/mon extra.

I really want Anthropic to let me make an API token that pulls from the same pool of usage that my Pro subscription does with the official clients. It would be cool to be able to run experiments with alternate clients and automation and stuff without having to go swipe the card at the ol' API token refilling station.

Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want

#28
post #19

Is an anthropic api key really necessary? A major roadblock for taking a test drive. Already have a Claud Max subscription but an anthropic api key still need at least 5$/mon extra.

You could use the prompts in the code to create a Claude Code sub-agent[1], which would do the same thing without an API key 1. https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/sub-agents

How would you invoke the subagent? Can a HookResponse cause a subagent to be invoked, to perform analysis on the action taken and then inject that back into the main loop?

Or would the hook invoke another instance of claude code?

I just read through the hook docs and I’m a bit fuzzy on the bidirectionality of it.

Post reply on HN