Show HN: What country you would hit if you went straight where you're pointing
21–30 of 45 posts
Re: Show HN: What country you would hit if you went straight where you're pointing
#22Cool! One of the countries in 1800 renders as “M?ori” for me, so it looks like you have some kind of character encoding issues (or there’s some language I don’t know about where ? is a letter). Feature request: is there a way to get a blurb about one’s current country? Lots of people on this site will get “Viceroyalty of New Spain” (the pre-independence name of Mexico, which included the entire current American South…
I think this error may be in the historical-basemaps data, because it is also present on https://historicborders.app/year/1800?lng=169.5234304&lat=-4...
Re: Show HN: What country you would hit if you went straight where you're pointing
#23Also, it reminds me of this HN conversation I found fascinating a few years back: Finding the longest straight line you could sail without hitting land - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16965650
Re: Show HN: What country you would hit if you went straight where you're pointing
#24Very neat! I was confused as to how the possible paths would lead me to France, or if I slightly moved my phone, Brazil. Then I remembered French Guiana - it might be worth adding awareness of things like overseas departments rather than just the parent country. Also, it reminds me of this HN conversation I found fascinating a few years back: Finding the longest straight line you could sail without hitting land - htt…
I'd guess showing the coordinates of the hit (and make it a link to maps) would be beneficial.
Re: Show HN: What country you would hit if you went straight where you're pointing
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
That makes sense, but I think constant latitude, in particular, is a special case that people often have in mind.
The other methods are about defining different meanings of what "going around" actually is while constant latitude is a special case of many such methods, e.g. great circle, not a new definition of what going that way means.
Re: Show HN: What country you would hit if you went straight where you're pointing
#26I wrote one of these but it only works for residents of san marino
Re: Show HN: What country you would hit if you went straight where you're pointing
#27Re: Show HN: What country you would hit if you went straight where you're pointing
#28Very neat! I was confused as to how the possible paths would lead me to France, or if I slightly moved my phone, Brazil. Then I remembered French Guiana - it might be worth adding awareness of things like overseas departments rather than just the parent country. Also, it reminds me of this HN conversation I found fascinating a few years back: Finding the longest straight line you could sail without hitting land - htt…
The Canary Islands are Spanish, but saying Spain in this situation wasn’t helpful when my mum was trying to book flights. Caused some mild confusion for a while.
Re: Show HN: What country you would hit if you went straight where you're pointing
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
The other methods are about defining different meanings of what "going around" actually is while constant latitude is a special case of many such methods, e.g. great circle, not a new definition of what going that way means.
I'm not sure what you mean, but a circle of constant latitude is definitely not a great circle (except on the equator).
Re: Show HN: What country you would hit if you went straight where you're pointing
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
The other methods are about defining different meanings of what "going around" actually is while constant latitude is a special case of many such methods, e.g. great circle, not a new definition of what going that way means.
I'm not sure what you mean, but a circle of constant latitude is definitely not a great circle (except on the equator).