Tangentially related, but is there any sort of chat bot that will look at the query and suggest which LLM might be the best for that particular task?
Have a look at OpenRouter's Auto Router[0].
Show HN: I built an LLM chat app because we shouldn't need 10 AI subscriptions
21–30 of 69 posts
Re: Show HN: I built an LLM chat app because we shouldn't need 10 AI subscriptions
#22There is an open source alternative
Re: Show HN: I built an LLM chat app because we shouldn't need 10 AI subscriptions
#23Re: Show HN: I built an LLM chat app because we shouldn't need 10 AI subscriptions
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's openrouter?
https://openrouter.ai/ edited to remove statement saying API only, as per comments.
Not sure if you noticed, but the first CTA on the link you posted is a prompt to "Start a message", which then opens a multi-model capable chat interface.
Re: Show HN: I built an LLM chat app because we shouldn't need 10 AI subscriptions
#25I also created my own. Frontend-only, no signup, based on openrouter, written in rust+leptos (wasm):
Re: Show HN: I built an LLM chat app because we shouldn't need 10 AI subscriptions
#26this already existed with things like POE. like I mean for normal users, with a subscription for multiple models. same with frontends for api keys.
Re: Show HN: I built an LLM chat app because we shouldn't need 10 AI subscriptions
#27If you truly couldn’t find anything then you clearly don’t know how to use a web search. Poe.com brings many models under one subscription, and they have you completely beat on features and the number of models they offer. They are owned by Quora, so have a decently large group backing them. You.com lets you use multiple models, and also offers more features and models than you. Perplexity lets you use multiple models to chat. Merlin.ai lets you use multiple models. The list goes on, but there are a variety of established players in this space.
It looks like the only thing you offer over them is a “pay-as-you-go” option, where they are only subscription based. You kind of cheapen your differentiating factor by also offering a subscription. You need to show how you’re different from the competitors in this space, otherwise your growth will be very slow. You’re competing against OpenAI and Anthropic who are trying to sell their chat interfaces along with the other aggregator websites who have been around longer and have been developing features as integrating models from various providers this whole time. Do you think your pricing model will be enough, or do you have some killer features planned?
Re: Show HN: I built an LLM chat app because we shouldn't need 10 AI subscriptions
#28Reminds me of the xkcd https://xkcd.com/927/
This thread has Cunningham's Law¹ written all over it, too
Re: Show HN: I built an LLM chat app because we shouldn't need 10 AI subscriptions
#29> Couldn't find one, so I built one.
there are no less than 100 of these.
Re: Show HN: I built an LLM chat app because we shouldn't need 10 AI subscriptions
#30> Couldn't find one, so I built one. there are no less than 100 of these.
They couldn't find one of their own. All those 100 others were built by others!