Have you fully tested it with Solaris or AIX? /s
Show HN: Basecoat – shadcn/UI components, no React required
21–30 of 79 posts
Re: Show HN: Basecoat – shadcn/UI components, no React required
#22I understand that Next.js can feel bloated, especially when used as a static site generator or within a classic JAMStack setup.
Basecoatui reminds me a bit of Bootstrap during the golden era of Ruby on Rails.
I took a look at the Git repository and tried to find an automated solution to convert shadcn to plain HTML but didn't find anything suitable. Is there a script available for this, or was this done manually?
Re: Show HN: Basecoat – shadcn/UI components, no React required
#23Re: Show HN: Basecoat – shadcn/UI components, no React required
#24Awesome. Using Vue/Tailwind, I'm definitely interested in this. Maybe you could try to add examples of integrations with others frameworks? I'll play with it and give you my 2 cents.
Re: Show HN: Basecoat – shadcn/UI components, no React required
#25Re: Show HN: Basecoat – shadcn/UI components, no React required
#26Re: Show HN: Basecoat – shadcn/UI components, no React required
#27Re: Show HN: Basecoat – shadcn/UI components, no React required
#28Why did you decide going old school using Alpine.js instead of using plain vanilla web components?
Re: Show HN: Basecoat – shadcn/UI components, no React required
#29Re: Show HN: Basecoat – shadcn/UI components, no React required
#30I've normally done DaisyUI + Tailwind + Rails but it never feels quite right. Basecoat is a really nice step forward.
I have to imagine the author is planning to charge for a premium package at some point, but given that a huge % of development is spent on UI design, I'd be more than happy to pay for a year of updates.