Earlier quoted context omitted.
You could acquaint yourself with the timeline of WebHID. Google presented a "spec" that wasn't even a spec. They were asked to create a better spec. Instead they just shipped WebHID, and several months later dumped several hundred pages of specifications saying "there". Whatever your position on hardware standards are, this is not how standards are presented. Edit: the status of WebHID is literally "not a W3C Standar…
I am acquainted with the process. Did you just miss entire premise of the article, how WebHID made the lives of a bunch of working people much better? Would you rather make these people have a much more difficult time now so Firefox diehard can have a “proper” WebHID in 5 years..?
It doesn't mean it's a good idea.