21–30 of 161 posts
I hope no one actually trusts that for real answers, just based on what we've seen it try to do already.
It won’t truly match the experience, unless it can inject veiled insults into the answers. /s
I've asked this before, but is having a domain name with someone else's business name in it allowed? The answer I was given last time was you can buy it it but you might not get to keep it. Still, I can't help but think it would be inevitable legal trouble.
It won’t truly match the experience, unless it can inject veiled insults into the answers. /s
I've asked this before, but is having a domain name with someone else's business name in it allowed? The answer I was given last time was you can buy it it but you might not get to keep it. Still, I can't help but think it would be inevitable legal trouble.
You really can't use the exact name of the people you are cloning. Even something like "stackrobot" would risky. Safest thing is to not use any words from the original product.
I hope no one actually trusts that for real answers, just based on what we've seen it try to do already.
Lol just yesterday I saw an eight year old answer on SO neatly solving my problem, except the API was hallucinated. Humans have been hallucinating APIs for far longer.
There is some imagined distinction between a hallucinated answer from a LLM and one from a person posting "try {random code}" that are both equally wrong - but only the LLM is deleted (because deleting the wrong answers are an attempt by a human to answer(?) or would hurt feelings / engagement (?)).
It won’t truly match the experience, unless it can inject veiled insults into the answers. /s
Thinking of adding an "arrogance" mode
It won’t truly match the experience, unless it can inject veiled insults into the answers. /s
Everybody got what they wanted and it’s much “nicer” now (it won’t even let you comment “what have you tried?” anymore, for instance). Wouldn’t you know it, the front page is now full of low-quality, low-effort questions.
But that doesn't get you the sweet sweet ad money I guess. Quick Stack Overflow, make another blog post no one gives a shit about, and continue banning 90k rep users over rollback wars.
I hope no one actually trusts that for real answers, just based on what we've seen it try to do already.
Lol just yesterday I saw an eight year old answer on SO neatly solving my problem, except the API was hallucinated. Humans have been hallucinating APIs for far longer.