This is a really amazing application of GPT. Did you fine tune a gpt3 model? If so, how did you implement its ability to say “I don’t know?”
It's not fine tuned. You literally just add something like "if the answer to the question isn't in the context, say 'I don't know'" It's wild.
Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
21–30 of 45 posts
Re: Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
#22Tip - you don’t actually need GPT-3 level embedding for a decent semantic search. Sentence transformers paired with one of their models is good enough.
I like this: https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/multi-qa-MiniLM... - since it’s very light.
Also, perhaps I am an idiot but I just used Postgres array field to store my embeddings array to keep things simple and free.
Re: Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
#23Re: Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
#24> What are the parts of the brain that become de-synchronized in the ADHD brain? >> The default mode network and the task networks become de-synchronized in the ADHD brain. > What are the three parts of the brain that become de-synchronized in the ADHD brain? >> The default mode network, the task networks, and the dopamine circuits. From https://youtu.be/hFL6qRIJZ_Y?t=1714 : > An area called the dorsolateral prefront…
It uses Whisper for transcripts, which I believe are better than the YouTube generated ones. My guess is that there are more relevant results from the semantic search than I'm including in the context (to reduce costs) and that exact snippet isn't being given to the answering model as context.
Re: Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
#25On a side note, Huberman Labs bothers me. I was an avid listener to the early episodes. As I have ADHD, some of his explanations of the brain chemistry involved in attention and motivation were fascinating. But in one of the early-ish episodes he said some completely ridiculous about acupuncture (that it worked) that makes me think he has no real critical thinking skills.
I hope anyone out there listening to him and thinking about applying any of the approaches he talks about just takes the time to see whether any other sources say they have real-world effects.
To the credit of the author, this tool highlights the exact thing I'm talking about. Try searching for...
"How does acupuncture work?"
"Acupuncture involves taking needles and sometimes electricity and or heat as well and stimulating particular locations on the body. Through these maps of stimulation that have been developed over thousands of years, mostly in Asia, acupuncture can reduce inflammation in the body by stimulating the body in particular ways at particular sites on the body, liberating certain cells and molecules that enhance the function of the immune system and potentially can be used to combat different types of infection."
Re: Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
#26I have some ideas of my own that I would love to implement similarly to this and it would help to know how to get started.
Re: Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
#27Re: Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
#28This is an amazing piece of work and as others have said, the site and the UI are perfect. On a side note, Huberman Labs bothers me. I was an avid listener to the early episodes. As I have ADHD, some of his explanations of the brain chemistry involved in attention and motivation were fascinating. But in one of the early-ish episodes he said some completely ridiculous about acupuncture (that it worked) that makes me t…
Another example is his episode with Matthew Walker[1] (author of Why We Sleep), and his other episodes where he gives sleep advice citing Walker as an authority. The problem is that Walker's work is not good[2][3] (riddled with errors at best, fraudulent at worst).
To be clear: I'm sure a lot (if not the majority) of what Huberman says is correct, or at least matches our current scientific understanding. The problem is that some things are incorrect, and the layman has no way of knowing which is which (especially since all the content is presented with the same high-certainty "science-based tools" tone)
[0] https://old.reddit.com/r/andrewhuberman/comments/smnnb0/crit...
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbQFSMayJxk
Re: Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
#29This is an amazing piece of work and as others have said, the site and the UI are perfect. On a side note, Huberman Labs bothers me. I was an avid listener to the early episodes. As I have ADHD, some of his explanations of the brain chemistry involved in attention and motivation were fascinating. But in one of the early-ish episodes he said some completely ridiculous about acupuncture (that it worked) that makes me t…
Prof Huberman is an expert and he reads up on relevant studies before talking about something. Even though he may occasionally make mistakes (who doesn't?), your evidence to the contrary, if any, should be at least as strong as his.
Moreover, accusing that an accomplished scientist lacks critical thinking skills should require substantial evidence.
[1] https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/acupuncture-what-you-need-t...
[2] https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-preventi...
and there are many other links one can easily find.
Re: Show HN: Factual AI Q&A – Answers based on Huberman Lab transcripts
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not fine tuned. You literally just add something like "if the answer to the question isn't in the context, say 'I don't know'" It's wild.
How did you do that?