Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Calculator for US individual income tax, from 1970-present

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 160 posts

Re: Show HN: Calculator for US individual income tax, from 1970-present

#21
post #12

Are all the dollar amounts in the simulated tax output at the top of the page inflation adjusted? For example, I inputted married, with no dependents with $500,000 salary and in 1977, the federal amount was $299,864 and in 2020 was $133,947. I assume these amounts can be compared without further adjusting for inflation? Tangentially, did federal taxes really come down that much?

In the 1970s there were massive tax deductions that don't exist today, so the actual tax incidence was much lower than what is implied by the marginal tax rates.

There was a major overhaul of the tax code in the 1980s that simultaneously eliminated many of the tax deductions and offset that loss of deductions with lower the marginal tax rates. The change was approximately revenue neutral but made the tax code simpler.

Re: Show HN: Calculator for US individual income tax, from 1970-present

#22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A quick google shows that yes, there was a 70% marginal tax rate (applying to income over $108,300 - not inflation adjusted - for a single filer) as recently as 1981 https://taxfoundation.org/historical-income-tax-rates-bracke...

But nobody ever paid it as there were millions of loopholes.

source?

Re: Show HN: Calculator for US individual income tax, from 1970-present

#23
post #12

Are all the dollar amounts in the simulated tax output at the top of the page inflation adjusted? For example, I inputted married, with no dependents with $500,000 salary and in 1977, the federal amount was $299,864 and in 2020 was $133,947. I assume these amounts can be compared without further adjusting for inflation? Tangentially, did federal taxes really come down that much?

Do you mean are the brackets themselves tax adjusted or the salaries? Because lets say there is a 300-500k bracket right now - that bracket (if it even existed in the 70s) would have been much, much higher.

Re: Show HN: Calculator for US individual income tax, from 1970-present

#24

That's brilliant work, thanks! Imagine if IRS would produce something like this (open sourced) and we could file our returns like this.

The IRS can already calculate your taxes for you. In other countries you just have to confirm what the revenue department calculates as your liability and hit "submit". You have to do the calculations yourself because TurboTax et al., and accountants lobbied so taxes are complicated and must be completed by the filer (or their accountant).

As much as I hate doing it now the first few years I did my taxes I went all paper and it really helped give me a foundational understanding of it all. Especially when you make that one typo.

Re: Show HN: Calculator for US individual income tax, from 1970-present

#27

That's brilliant work, thanks! Imagine if IRS would produce something like this (open sourced) and we could file our returns like this.

NBER's biggest contributors are the US government. Ironically, the IRS isn't one of them.[1]

As an aside, I'd love to see US gov research grants start requiring the work product to be made open source.

[1]: https://www.nber.org/about-nber/support-funding

Re: Show HN: Calculator for US individual income tax, from 1970-present

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The IRS can already calculate your taxes for you. In other countries you just have to confirm what the revenue department calculates as your liability and hit "submit". You have to do the calculations yourself because TurboTax et al., and accountants lobbied so taxes are complicated and must be completed by the filer (or their accountant).

I didn't point that out: I originate from a country in which I used to get a postcard summarizing what they thought I owed with a "Yes, I agree" checkbox and a field to sign. You could always file an extensive return if desired, but unless you had complicated (notably international) transactions, the return was basically accurate. This only works because there's a high level of trust in the government and low corrupt…

The US demands extremely detailed tracking of your income. We just get nothing in return for it.

Re: Show HN: Calculator for US individual income tax, from 1970-present

#29

I wish this would get written up in mainstream media. Hypothesis being that if more people knew this existed, it would put additional pressure on Congress to simplify tax filing.

The number of possible inputs for Income is stunning: 15 types of income in total.

There are “only” 5 possible inputs under Deductions & Credits but 3 of them are categories with several subitems:

Itemized Deductions

• Home mortgage interest

• Deductible medical expenses

• Motor Vehicle registration fees

• Charitable contributions

• Casulty or Theft losses

Other Itemized Deductions

• Other state and local taxes

• Deductible medical expenses (preference share only)

• Miscellaneous expenses

Other Adjustments

• Alimony Paid

• Keogh and IRA contributions

• Foreign Income Exclusion

• Net Operating Losses

Re: Show HN: Calculator for US individual income tax, from 1970-present

#30
post #12

Are all the dollar amounts in the simulated tax output at the top of the page inflation adjusted? For example, I inputted married, with no dependents with $500,000 salary and in 1977, the federal amount was $299,864 and in 2020 was $133,947. I assume these amounts can be compared without further adjusting for inflation? Tangentially, did federal taxes really come down that much?

In the 1970s there were massive tax deductions that don't exist today, so the actual tax incidence was much lower than what is implied by the marginal tax rates. There was a major overhaul of the tax code in the 1980s that simultaneously eliminated many of the tax deductions and offset that loss of deductions with lower the marginal tax rates. The change was approximately revenue neutral but made the tax code simpler…

seems like this would render the website pretty useless for anything before that period, right?
Post reply on HN